Knowledge Base Category -
Included in the basic format for National Coverage Determinations (NCDs) are Nationally Covered Indications and Nationally Non-Covered Indications sections. In general, NCDs are created to outline covered indications. However, there are NCDs specifically detailing that a service is non-covered such as:
- NCD 280.2 White Cane for Use by a Blind Person,
- NCD 30.5 Transcendental Meditation, and
- NCD 30.3 Acupuncture.
Fortunately, for Medicare beneficiaries, with the January 21, 2020 release of Final Decision Memo (CAG-00452N), acupuncture for chronic low back pain (cLBP) is now a viable treatment option.
Acupuncture NCD Timeline
NCD 30.3 Acupuncture
CMS initially issued a National Non-coverage Determination for Acupuncture (NCD 30.3) in May 1980. This non-coverage determination indicates that “although acupuncture has been used for thousands of years in China and for decades in parts of Europe...Medicare reimbursement for acupuncture, as an anesthetic or as an analgesic or for other therapeutic purposes, may not be made.”
Since the initial acupuncture NCD, in 2004, CMS concluded there was no convincing evidence for the use of acupuncture for pain relief in patients with fibromyalgia or patients with osteoarthritis and published two additional NCDs for non-coverage of acupuncture:
- NCD 30.3.1 – Acupuncture for Fibromyalgia, and
- NCD 30.3.2 – Acupuncture for Osteoarthritis.
CMS Proposes to Cover Acupuncture for Chronic Low Back Pain
In a July 15, 2019 Press Release, CMS announced their proposal to cover acupuncture for cLBP as a potential alternative to opioid use, while data is collected on patient outcomes. HHS Secretary Alex Azar noted, “Defeating our country’s epidemic of opioid addiction requires identifying all possible ways to treat the very real problem of chronic pain, and this proposal would provide patients with new options while expanding our scientific understanding of alternative approaches to pain.”
January 21, 2020: CMS Releases Final Decision Memo for Acupuncture for Chronic Low Back Pain (CAG-00452N)
CMS indicated in a related Press Release they had “conducted evidence reviews and examined coverage policies of private payers to inform today’s decision.”
NCD 30.3.3 Acupuncture for Medicare Beneficiaries with cLBP
What is covered?
Up to 12 visits in 90 days are covered for Medicare beneficiaries under the following circumstances:
- For the purpose of this decision, chronic low back pain (cLBP) is defined as:
- Lasting 12 weeks or longer;
- nonspecific, in that it has no identifiable systemic cause (i.e., not associated with metastatic, inflammatory, infectious, etc. disease);
- not associated with surgery; and
- not associated with pregnancy.
- An additional eight sessions will be covered for those patients demonstrating an improvement. No more than 20 acupuncture treatments may be administered annually.
- Treatment must be discontinued if the patient is not improving or is regressing.
What is Non-Covered?
Nationally Non-Covered Indications: “All types of acupuncture including dry needling for any condition other than cLBP are non-covered by Medicare.”
Who Can Furnish Acupuncture for Medicare Fee-for-Service Population?
- Physicians (as defined in 1861(r)(1)) may furnish acupuncture in accordance with applicable state requirements.
- Physician assistants, nurse practitioners/clinical nurse specialists (as identified in 1861(aa)(5)), and auxiliary personnel may furnish acupuncture if they meet all applicable state requirements and have:
- A masters or doctoral level degree in acupuncture or Oriental Medicine from a school accredited by the Accreditation Commission on Acupuncture and Oriental Medicine (ACAOM); and
- Current, full, active, and unrestricted license to practice acupuncture in a State, Territory, or Commonwealth (i.e. Puerto Rico) of the United States, or District of Columbia.
Auxiliary personnel furnishing acupuncture must be under the appropriate level of supervision of a physician, physician assistant, or nurse practitioner/clinical nurse specialist required by our regulations at 42 CFR §§ 410.26 and 410.27.
Who Can Furnish Acupuncture: Comments & CMS Responses in Final Decision Memo
Comment: Several commenters suggested that acupuncture should only be performed by licensed acupuncturists and not be physicians, physician assistants, or nurse practitioners/clinical nurse specialists who would not have the specialized training a licensed acupuncturist would have.
CMS Response: The coverage criteria defined in section I of this decision memo states that physician assistants, nurse practitioners/clinical nurse specialists, and auxiliary personnel must have a masters or doctoral level degree in acupuncture or Oriental Medicine from a school accredited by the ACAOM, and language has been added to specify a current, full, active, and unrestricted license to practice acupuncture in a State, Territory, or Commonwealth (i.e. Puerto Rico) of the United States, or District of Columbia. These requirements are consistent either with the requirements of the qualification standards of private payers (which vary as discussed further below) for licensed acupuncturists who treat patients (and also the standards for VA medical centers or the requirements used to identify providers who perform acupuncture paid by the VA in the community). As noted above, licensed acupuncturists cannot directly bill Medicare for services.
Comment: One commenter requested chiropractic doctors who have completed the 100 hour acupuncture course and examination approved by the American Chiropractic Association (ACA) and the National Board of Chiropractic Examiners (NBCE) be included in the list of personnel able to furnish acupuncture in the studies.
CMS Response: CMS notes that the requirements for chiropractic acupuncturists vary widely from state to state. CMS also notes Medicare covers manual manipulation of the spine if medically necessary to correct a subluxation when provided by a chiropractor (or other qualified provider). Medicare does not cover other services or tests ordered by a chiropractor, including acupuncture. However, if a chiropractor fulfills the requirements in section I of this decision memo as auxiliary personnel, they would be eligible to furnish acupuncture “incident to” a physician’s service.
What Benefit Category does Acupuncture Fall Within?
Medicare is a defined benefit program. Items or services must fall within one of the statutorily defined benefit categories outlined in the Social Security Act. According to the Decision Memo, acupuncture qualifies as:
- Incident to a physician’s professional service,
- Inpatient Hospital Services,
- Outpatient Hospital Services Incident to a Physician’s Service, and
- Physician’s Services
Consideration of Benefits and Harms
“We believe that in light of the relative safety of the procedure and the grave consequences of the opioid crisis in the United States, there is sufficient rationale to provide this nonpharmacologic treatment to appropriate beneficiaries with chronic low back pain. Several professional societies and experts (such as the American Pain Association and American College of Physicians) also supported acupuncture as a nonpharmacologic treatment option to consider.
We have reviewed coverage policies of private payers including integrated health systems. A number of other payers such as Aetna, various Blue Cross Blue Shield plans, Cigna, Kaiser Permanente, and United Healthcare provide some coverage of acupuncture for certain indications or offer advantage plans that may provide coverage. There is variation in covered indications and frequency of services.”
NCD 30.3.3 Acupuncture for cLBP
Effective for services performed on or after January 21, 2020, CMS will cover acupuncture for Medicare patients with cLBP when the Nationally Covered Indications are met and will be manualized under NCD 30.3.3, Acupuncture for cLBP.
Beth Cobb
In a January 23, 2020 CMS Blog, CMS Administrator Seema Verma shared CMS’ plans to improve tools found at Medicare.gov (Hospital, Nursing Home, Home Health, Dialysis Facility, Long-term Care Hospital, Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility, Physician and Hospice Compare Tools). Administrator Verma notes while the Compare tools are among the most popular, “each one functions independently with varying user interfaces that make them difficult to understand and challenging to navigate.”
CMS plans to improve the customer experience by combining and standardizing the eight existing Compare tools. “The new “Medicare Care Compare” on Medicare.gov will offer Medicare beneficiaries and their caregivers and other users a consistent look and feel, providing a streamlined experience to meet their individual needs in accessing information about health care providers and care settings. In the new, unified experience, patients will be able to easily find the information that is most important to help make health care decisions, like getting quality data by the type of health care provider.”
CMS plans to launch “Medicare Care Compare” this spring, kicking off with a transition period allowing the public to use the new combined Compare alongside the existing tools before they are retired. It just so happens CMS has promised a spring 2020 release of sub-regulatory guidance to the new Discharge Planning Conditions of Participation (CoP) Final Rule that went into effect in November 2019. Updates to both can’t come soon enough as hospitals work to comply with the new CoPs requirement of sharing data from the Compare websites to beneficiaries seeking post-acute care services at the time of discharge.
In the meantime, CMS made data updates to Hospital Compare in January. Among the changes were data updates for the Hospital Readmission Reduction Program (HRRP) and Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program.
Hospital Readmissions
CMS began reducing Medicare payments for Inpatient Prospective Payment System Hospitals (IPPS) hospitals with excess readmissions in October 2012. CMS calculates readmission rates for specific conditions through the Hospital Readmission Reduction Program (HRRP). Current specific conditions include:
- Heart Attack (AMI),
- Heart Failure (HF),
- Pneumonia (PNA),
- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD),
- Hip/Knee Replacement (THA/TKA), and
- Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery (CABG).
For FY 2020, Medicare estimates hospitals will lose $563 million. A hospitals specific penalty amount will be deducted from each inpatient claim billed during the FY. You can read more about the penalties in an October 1, 2019 Kaiser Health News (KHN) article by Jordan Rau.
Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program
The HAC Reduction Program began in FY 2015 and is a Medicare pay-for-performance program supporting the CMS effort to link Medicare payments to quality in the inpatient hospital setting. Hospitals ranking in the worst-performing quartile with respect to risk-adjusted HAC quality measures are subject to a 1 percent payment reduction.
Per a January 31, 2020 Kaiser Health News (KHN) article by Jordan Rau, 786 hospitals will receive lower payments during FY 2020.
Kaiser Health News (KHN) is a national health policy news service. It is an editorially independent program of the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation which is not affiliated with Kaiser Permanente.
Beth Cobb
MEDICARE TRANSMITTALS – RECURRING UPDATES
Calendar Year (CY) 2020 Annual Update for Clinical Laboratory Fee Schedule and Laboratory Services Subject to Reasonable Charge Payment
Provider Type Affected: Clinical Diagnostic Labs
Provider Action Needed: Change Request (CR) 11598 provides instructions for CY 2020, mapping for new codes, and updates for lab costs subject to reasonable charge payment.
MLN Article MM11598: https://www.cms.gov/files/document/mm11598.pdf
January 2020 Update of the Ambulatory Surgical Center (ASC) Payment System
Provider Type Affected: ASCs billing Medicare Administrative Contractors
Provider Action Needed: CR 11607 informs MACs about updates to the ASC payment system for Calendar Year (CY) 2019 and describes changes to and billing instructions for various payment policies in the January 2020 ASC payment system update. This notification also includes updates to the HCPCS. Be sure your billing staffs are aware of these changes.
MLN Article MM11607: https://www.cms.gov/files/document/MM11607.pdf
January 2020 Integrated Outpatient Code Editor (I/OCE) Specifications Version 21.0
Provider Type(s) Affected: Hospitals, Other Providers and Suppliers Billing MACs
What You Need to Know: This article is based on CR 11564, informs MACs, including Home Health MACs, and the Fiscal Intermediary Shared System (FISS) that the I/OCE is being updated for January 1, 2010.
MLN Article MM11564: https://www.cms.gov/files/document/mm11564.pdf
Clinical Laboratory Fee Schedule – Medicare Travel Allowance Fees for Collection of Specimens
What You Need to Know: This Change Request (CR) revises the payment of travel allowances when billed on a per mileage basis using Health Care Common Procedure Coding System (HCPCS) code P9603 and when billed on a flat rate basis using HCPCS code P9604 for calendar year 2020.
MLN Article MM11641: https://www.cms.gov/files/document/mm11641.pdf
Quarterly Update to the National Correct Coding Initiative (NCCI) Procedure-to-Procedure (PTP) Edits, Version 26.1, Effective Date: April 1, 2020
MLN Article MM11628: https://www.cms.gov/files/document/mm11628.pdf
OTHER MEDICARE TRANSMITTALS
Internet Only Manual Update to Pub 100-04, Chapter 16, Section 40.8 – Laboratory date of Service Policy
Provider Type Affected: Laboratories & other providers
What You Need to Know: In response to comments, CMS finalized excluding blood banks or centers from the laboratory DOS exception at 42 CFR 414.510(b)(5) in the CY 2020 OPPS/ASC final rule published on November 12, 2019. CMS also adopted a definition of “blood bank or center” and clarified that this policy change categorically excludes molecular pathology testing performed by laboratories that are blood banks or blood centers from the laboratory DOS exception at 42 CFR 414.510(b)(5).
MLN Article MM11574: https://www.cms.gov/files/document/mm11574.pdf
Revised Medicare Transmittals
January 2020 Update of the Hospital Outpatient Prospective Payment System (OPPS)
Transmittal 266 replaces transmittal 264 released on December 20, 2019. Corrections made include:
- Section 5: change “removing 12 procedures from IPO list” to “removing 11 procedures from IPO list”
- Add a new section, number 18, “Correction of deductible and Coinsurance for HCPCS code, G0404,” and
- Change section 18 “Coverage Determinations” to section 19.
MLN Matters Article MM11605: https://www.cms.gov/files/document/mm11605.pdf
MEDICARE SPECIAL MLN & SPECIAL EDITION ARTICLES
SE18006 Reissued: New Medicare Beneficiary Identifier (MBI) Get It, Use It
On January 2, 2020 to update language reflected the use of the MBI number is fully implemented.
SE19006 Revised: Medicare Part B Clinical Laboratory Fee Schedule: Revised Information for Laboratories on Collecting and Reporting Data for the Private Payor Rate-Based Payment System
Article Release Date: January 8, 2020
The Data Reporting Period has been delayed one year and as such all references to the 2020 data reporting period have been changed to 2021.
SE20002: Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) for Advanced Diagnostic Imaging – Approval of Using the K3 Segment for Institutional Claims
Article Release Date: January 10, 2020
Provider Action Needed: This article provides guidance for processing claims for certain institutional claims that are subject to the Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) program for advanced diagnostic imaging services. The CMS will begin to accept claims with this information as of January 1, 2020. This SE article contains an attached advanced diagnostic imaging UB-04 claim examples to help better understand the claims-based reporting concept of the AUC program.
https://www.cms.gov/files/document/se20002.pdf
MEDICARE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES
January 2020 MLN Catalog
2020 marks the Medicare Learning Network’s® (MLN’s) 20th anniversary and the January 2020 Edition of the MLN Catalog is now available. Resources you will find in the catalog:
- MLN Matters® Articles
- Publications and Educational Tools
- MLN Connects® Newsletter
- Web-based Training Courses, and
- Provider Association Partnerships.
Billing Correctly for Polysomnography
The January 16, 2020 edition of MLN Connects provided Polysomnography Compliance Information, noting in a recent report, the Office of Inspector General (OIG) determined that CMS improperly paid practitioners for some claims associated with polysomnography services that did not meet Medicare requirements. We revised the Provider Compliance Tips for Polysomnography (Sleep Studies) (PDF) Fact Sheet to help you bill correctly. Additional resources:
- Medicare Claims Processing Manual, Chapter 15 (PDF) , Section 70
- Questionable Billing for Polysomnography Services OIG Report
- Medicare Payments to Providers for Polysomnography Services Did Not Always Meet Medicare Billing Requirements OIG Report
OTHER MEDICARE UPDATES
2020 OPPS Correction Notice
On January 3, 2020, CMS published a correction notice in the Federal Register. This document corrects technical errors that appeared in the final rule that appeared in the November 12, 2019 issue of the Federal Register. Included in the notice is the inadvertent omission of two additional botulinum toxin injection codes J0586 and J0588 that have now been added to the codes in Table 65 – Final List of Outpatient Services That Require Prior Authorization.
You can read more about the new Prior Authorization requirement in a related MMP article at http://www.mmplusinc.com/news-articles/item/2020-opps-final-rule-supervision-of-therapeutic-services-and-prior-authorizations.
Palmetto GBA Jurisdiction J Medicare Advantage (MA) Plan Overpayments Update
On January 3, 2020, Phase III Settlement Offer Letters were mailed to affected providers. The settlement offer is intended to address all remaining unresolved “MA overpayment” claims.
https://www.palmettogba.com/palmetto/providers.nsf/ls/JJ%20Part%20A"AZ9J8M2780?opendocument
New Important Message from Medicare (IM) and Detailed Notice of Discharge
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has renewed the IM (CMS-10065) and DND (CMS-10066). The revised IM has a new CMS Form number (CMS-10065). It was formerly CMS-R-193. Hospitals are required to use the new forms as of April 1, 2020. Until then the previous and new versions are acceptable for use. You can access the forms at the following links:
- https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-General-Information/BNI/Downloads/Important-Message-English-and-Spanish.zip
- https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-General-Information/BNI/Downloads/Detailed-Notice-English-and-Spanish.zip
New Medicare Outpatient Observation Notice (MOON)
The OMB has renewed the MOON (CMS-10611). The only change made was the expiration date is now 12/31/2022. Similar to the IM and DND, hospitals are required to use the new MOON beginning April 1, 2020. Both previous and new versions are acceptable for use through March 31, 2020. You can access the MOON at the following link:
January 13, 2020 Memorandum: Informational Notice: Forthcoming Integration of the Psychiatric Hospital Program into the Hospital Program and State Operations Manual (SOM) Changes
Aims of Memorandum:
- To improve the identification of quality issues, the CMS is in the process of integrating the psychiatric hospital program survey into the hospital program survey,
- Update and relocation of the Interpretive Guidelines for Psychiatric Hospitals, and
- Develop training to provide the necessary competencies for all State Survey Agency surveyors to evaluate compliance with the psychiatric hospital CoPs.
Link to Memorandum: https://www.cms.gov/files/document/admin-info-20-05-hospitalpsych.pdf
Link to Related CMS Newsroom Fact Sheet: https://www.cms.gov/newsroom/fact-sheets/cms-reduces-psychiatric-hospital-burden-new-survey-process
2020 Updates to OIG Work Plan
OIG updates this dynamic, web-based Work Plan monthly to ensure that it more closely aligns with the work planning process. The monthly update includes the addition of newly initiated Work Plan items, which can be found on the Recently Added Items page. Beginning in January 2020, completed Work Plan items will remain in the active Work Plan for one month, after which they will be moved into the Archive. Recently completed reports can be found on OIG's What's New page. This web-based Work Plan will evolve as OIG continues to pursue complete, accurate, and timely public updates regarding our planned, ongoing, and published work.
January 2020 Medicare Quarterly Provider Compliance Newsletter
The January 2020 edition of this newsletter includes CERT review findings specific to the provision of Lumbar Sacral Orthosis (LSO) and Recovery Auditor findings from a review of Trastuzumab (Herceptin), J9355.
Vaping-Related Disorder ICD-10-CM Guidance Timeline
As of January 14, 2020, a total of 2,668 hospitalized EVALI (E-Cigarette or Vaping product use-Associated Lung Injury) cases or deaths have been reported to the CDC from all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and two U.S. territories (Puerto Rico and U.S. Virgin Islands). Sixty deaths have been confirmed in 27 states and the District of Columbia.
In response to the vaping crisis, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has been proactive by providing guidelines, a new ICD-10-CM code and most recently posting an April 2020 Addenda.
- October 17, 2019: An ICD-10-CM Official Coding Guidelines – Supplement was posted on the CDC website. This supplement is intended to be used with the October 1, 2019 edition of the ICD-10-CM Official Coding Guidelines for Coding and Reporting.
- December 9, 2019: The CDC announced a new emergency code established by the World Health Organization (WHO) for vaping-related disorders. This code became valid for immediate use as of September 24, 2019.
- 0, Vaping-related disorder
- January 15, 2020: The CDC posted an ICD-10-CM Tabular List of Diseases and Injuries Addenda to be implemented April 1, 2020.
- January 24, 2020: CMS released MLN Matters MM11623: Update to the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) for Vaping Related Disorder
New ICD-10-CM Browser Tool
On January 3, 2020 the CDC posted a new browser tool on their ICD-10-CM webpage. “This user-friendly web-based query application allows users to search for codes….and provides instructional information needed to understand the usage of ICD-10-CM codes. The application provides access to multiple fiscal year version sets that are available with real-time comprehensive results via the search capabilities.”
CDC Specific Vaping Related Disorder information as well as the new Browser Tool are available at https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/icd/icd10cm.htm.
Increasing Access to Innovative Antibiotics for Hospital Inpatients Using New Technology Add-On Payments: Frequently Asked Questions
CMS released MLN Matters SE20004 on January 21, 2020 for hospitals billing for services provided to Medicare beneficiaries. Specifically, this article details changes made by CMS to develop alternative New Technology Add-On Payment (NTAP) to increase access to innovative antibiotics for hospital inpatients and provides a series of frequently asked questions to educate hospitals on changes to the new NTAP policy for Qualified Infectious Disease Products (QIDPs).
Beth Cobb
Background
In November 2019, the Office of Inspector General (OIG) released the Report Medicare Improperly Paid Acute-Care Hospitals $54.4 Million for Inpatient Claims Subject to the Post-Acute-Care Transfer Policy.
The OIG performed this review due to the fact that in prior reviews, they had identified almost $242 million in overpayments to hospitals that did not comply with Medicare’s Post-Acute-Care Transfer (PACT) Policy. In fact, there have been eight prior OIG related reviews dating back to the Implementation of Medicare’s Postacute Care Transfer Policy report issued on October 10, 2001.
Specifically, hospitals transferred patients to a skilled nursing facility setting, but submitted a discharge disposition as if the patient were discharged home resulting in higher reimbursement for the hospital.
Review Approach
- The audit period included claims with dates of service from January 1, 2016, through December 31, 2018.
- The review covered $212 million in Medicare Part A payments for 18,647 inpatient claims subject to the PACT Policy.
- Claims Selection:
- First, the OIG identified claims with a patient discharge status code indicating a discharged to home or certain types of healthcare institutions.
- The OIG then used beneficiary information and services dates to identify services from post-acute-care providers that began on the same date as the inpatient discharge for SNF claims or within three days of the inpatient discharge for home health claims.
Review Findings
Medicare improperly paid acute-care hospitals $54.4 million for 18,647 claims subject to the transfer policy.
Process for Determining Overpayment
Acute care hospitals discharging a Medicare beneficiary to home or certain types of healthcare institutions receive the full MS-DRG payment submitted for the hospitalization. “In contrast, Medicare pays an acute-care hospital that transfers a beneficiary to post-acute care a per diem rate for each day of the beneficiary’s stay in the hospital. The total overpayment of $54.4million represented the difference between the amount of the full MS-DRG payments and the amount that would have been paid if the per diem rates had been applied.”
OIG Recommendations
The OIG recommended that CMS direct Medicare Administrative Contractors (MACs) to do the following:
- Recover the $54.4 million in identified overpayments,
- Identify any claims for transfers to post-acute care in which incorrect patient discharge status codes were used and direct the MACs to recover any overpayments after the audit period, and
- Ensure the MACs are receiving the post-payment edit’s automatic notifications of improperly billed claims and are taking action by adjusting the original inpatient claims to initiate recovery of the overpayments. “If all of the Medicare contractors had received the postpayment edit’s automatic notifications of improperly billed claims and had properly taken action since CY 2013, Medicare could have saved $70,011,503.”
CMS Response
CMS concurred with all of the OIG’s recommendations and provided a plan of action to the OIG to address the recommendations.
January 23, 2020 Palmetto GBA Daily Newsletter: OIG Audit Adjustments
Last week, Palmetto announced that they will be sending letters notifying Jurisdiction J and M hospitals of the OIG Audit Overpayment adjustments. The letters only state the reason for adjustment as “overpayment.” Palmetto GBA identifies the type of bill (TOB) 11K adjustments by entering verbiage in the Remarks field as “OIG AUDIT A-09-19-03007.”
You can read the full Palmetto Article as well as sign up for Article Update Notifications specific to this issue on the Palmetto website.
Beth Cobb
The last Wednesday@One of each month includes an article highlighting Medicare Transmittals and Other Updates released by CMS during that month. This month brings the addition of a new standing article highlighting offerings from the Medicare Administrative Contractors or MACs. More specifically, highlights from MAC daily e-newsletters and alerts that provide useful information even when it is not the MAC for your hospitals.
Background
MACs are multi-state, regional contractors responsible for administering both Medicare Part A and Medicare Part B claims. MACs perform many activities including:
- Process Medicare FFS claims
- Make and account for Medicare FFS payments
- Enroll providers in the Medicare FFS program
- Handle provider reimbursement services and audit institutional provider cost reports
- Handle redetermination requests (1st stage appeals process)
- Respond to provider inquiries
- Educate providers about Medicare FFS billing requirements
- Establish local coverage determinations (LCD’s)
- Review medical records for selected claims
- Coordinate with CMS and other FFS contractors
Currently there are 12 A/B MACs who serve more than 1.5 million health care providers enrolled in the Medicare Fee-for-Service (FFS) program. Collectively, the MACs process more than 1.2 billion Medicare FFS claims annually. You can learn more about the MACs on the CMS MAC webpage at https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Contracting/Medicare-Administrative-Contractors/MedicareAdministrativeContractors.
It is in the spirit of provider inquiries, education, and medical reviews that prompted the addition of this monthly article to our newsletter.
January 6, 2020 WPS GHA Medicare eNews: Major Joint Replacement (Hip and Knee) CERT Reviews
The Comprehensive Error Rate Testing (CERT) contractor has noted error findings for joint replacement services. In most cases, the CERT contractor found the documentation for these services to be insufficient to support the service(s) according to Medicare guidelines.
Documentation Reminders
- Physical examination should document the specific patient condition(s), past and present, and plan of care
- Investigation through radiology reports
- Documentation of tried and failed conservative (non-surgical) treatments
- Signed and dated operative report
For more information, see the MLN Matters article SE1236.
January 8, 2020 First Coast Service Options, Inc. eNews
Appeals News: Q&A’s to questions regularly received by the First Coast contact center regarding general information about appeals, overpayment appeals, and re-openings. https://medicare.fcso.com/Appeals/0410177.asp
January 8, 2020: Palmetto GBA Provider Contact Center (PCC) FAQs:
Oct – December 2019 FAQs published were based upon data analytics identifying topics generating a high volume of telephone enquiries. Following is an example of one FAQ that MMP gets asked on occasion also:
- Question: When did CMS begin to require one calendar years as timely filing?
- Answer: All claims for services furnished on or after Jan 1, 2010, must be filed to the Medicare contractor no later than one calendar year (12 months) from the date of service or Medicare will deny those claims. You may refer to MM6960, (PDF, 74 KB) MM7080 (PDF, 78 KB) and New Maximum Period for the Submission of Medicare Claims podcast .
https://www.palmettogba.com/palmetto/providers.nsf/ls/JJ%20Part%20A"BKLSNF7223?opendocument
January 9, 2020 NGS Urgent News: [Update} NCD ICD-10 Diagnosis Code Changes for 2020
Date Reported: 12/19/2019
Date Modified: 1/8/2020
Status: Open
Provider Type(s) Impacted: Part A, including home health and hospice (HHH) and federally qualified health centers (FQHCs)
Reason Code(s): Part A RCs, see below
Claim Coding Impact: Multiple ICD-10 codes to be added to the listed national coverage determinations (NCDs).
Description of Issue
On 11/1/2019, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) issued Change Request (CR) 11491 and accompanying MLN11491 with an effective date of 4/1/2020. CMS has now issued additional instructions impacting the following NCDs, for which new ICD-10 diagnosis codes will not be systematically implemented until 4/6/2020. Local editing will be temporarily implemented for the following, allowing claims to process:
- NCD 20.9 Artificial Hearts and Related Devices – RC 59242-59243
- NCD 20.34 Percutaneous Left-Atrial Appendage Closure – RC 59267
- NCD 190.11 Home PT/INR – RC 59079-59080
- NCD 260.9 Heart Transplants – RC 59180-59181
Editing will remain in place for the following, and denied claims subject to the standard appeal process:
- NCD 110.4 Extracorporeal Photophoresis RC59019-59020, 59023-59024
- NCD 210.3 Colorectal Cancer Screening RC 59099-59100
National Government Services Action
For NCDs 20.9, 20.34, 190.11 and 260.9, National Government Services (NGS) will now modify internal editing to allow processing for claims with the new ICD-10 diagnosis codes. For NCDs 110.4 and 210.3, denials relative to new ICD-10 codes may be submitted as appeals. In addition, NGS will adjust claims already denied since 10/1/2019 relative to this issue when brought to our attention.
Provider Action
Rejected claims (59267) will be reprocessed. Any claim with a LINE LEVEL denial can be resubmitted instead of filing an appeal (please refer to Submit an Adjustment to Correct Claims Partially Denied by Automated LCD/NCD Denials). Fully denied claims may be submitted as appeals. When submitting associated appeals, providers may identify CR 11491 as a reference.
Proposed Resolution/Fix
Will be systematically implemented on 4/6/2020.
January 9, 2020: Palmetto GBA Daily Newsletter: Medicare Beneficiary Identifier (MBI) Q&A
The following Q&A appeared in Palmetto’s Thursday January 9, 2020 Daily e-Newsletter:
- Question: Can I obtain an MBI for a deceased beneficiary using the eServices MBI Lookup tool?
- Answer: Yes. Users may obtain an MBI as long as the Medicare beneficiary information entered is valid and the beneficiary's date of death is less than 13 months prior to the date the MBI Lookup inquiry is performed.
If the Medicare beneficiary information submitted in the MBI Lookup is valid, but the beneficiary's recorded date of death is more than 13 months prior to the date the MBI Lookup inquiry is performed, the user will receive a message advising that the date of death exceeds the timely claim filing requirement. The MBI will not be returned.
https://www.palmettogba.com/palmetto/providers.nsf/ls/JJ%20Part%20A"BJ9RJ40743?opendocument
January 13, 2020: WPS GHA Medicare Review (MR) Targeted Probe & Educate (TPE) Quarterly Update – J5A
Throughout quarter four of 2019, the MR clinical staff identified the following common errors:
- Inpatient Psychiatric Hospital Services (IPS):
- Reviews identify the psychiatric evaluations are incomplete. The CMS Internet-Only Manual (IOM) Publication 100-02, Chapter 2, Section 30.2 lists the components of the psychiatric evaluation. These include the following:
- a medical history,
- record of mental status,
- onset of illness and circumstances leading to admission,
- description of attitudes and behaviors, intellectual functioning, memory functioning and orientation, and
- an inventory of the patient's assets.
- Reviews continue to identify errors related to certification requirements. For more information related to certification requirements review our Inpatient Psychiatric Facility (IPF) Certification/Recertification Review Results resource.
- Wound Care: Reviews identify the documentation is incomplete and not meeting the requirements of WPS Local Coverage Determination (LCD) L37228. The documentation should support evidence of improvement, which includes measurable changes. Measurable changes include the amount of drainage, inflammation, swelling, pain, wound dimensions, and necrotic tissue. If there is no wound improvement the documentation should support a modification to the treatment plan.
- Inpatient Rehabilitation Facilities (IRF): The results of the Round 2 reviews support improvement of the documentation on the pre-admission screening and post admission evaluation. Five providers completed Round 2 and are no longer undergoing review.
January 13, 2020: WPS GHA Medicare Review (MR) Targeted Probe & Educate (TPE) Quarterly Update – J8A
Throughout quarter four of 2019, the MR clinical staff identified the following common errors:
- Malnutrition: Twelve providers completed Round 1 of TPE and were successful in their reviews. The diagnosis of severe malnutrition was evident in the documentation.
- Outpatient Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy (HBO-T): Reviews identify incomplete documentation to support the HBO-T condition. When providers treat a patient for multiple diagnoses, it is important to state clearly which diagnosis necessitated the need for HBO-T, and to include the prior history and treatment for support. The CMS National Coverage Determination (NCD) 20.29 outlines the covered conditions.
January 13, 2020: Palmetto GBA Daily Newsletter: Medical Necessity of Therapeutic Exercise
In this edition of their Daily Newsletter, Palmetto GBA posted a module focused on the medical necessity of therapeutic exercises. The following topics are covered in this module:
- Therapeutic Exercise Overview,
- Therapy Billing,
- Requirements for Medical Necessity,
- Documentation Requirements, and
- Reminders.
- At the top of the list of reminders list is the reminder that beginning January 1, 2020 a new modifier is required on claims for physical and occupational therapy services provided in whole or in part by a therapy assistant.
Palmetto advises you to share this with appropriate staff.
https://www.palmettogba.com/internet/eLearn3.nsf/MedicalNecessityPartB/story_html5.html
January 14, 2020: Palmetto GBA Daily Newsletter: Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Module
Just a day after the Therapeutic Exercise Module, Palmetto posted an Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) Module which includes information about covered conditions, billing and coding guidelines, multileaf collimator and medical necessity.
https://palmettogba.com/internet/eLearn3.nsf/IntensityModulatedRadiationTherapy/story_html5.html
Beth Cobb
“I hope that in this year to come, you make mistakes. Because if you are making mistakes, then you are making new things, trying new things, learning, living, pushing yourself, changing yourself, changing your world. You’re doing things you’ve never done before, and more importantly, you’re doing something.”
So that’s my wish for you, and all of us, and my wish for myself. Make New Mistakes. Make glorious, amazing mistakes. Make mistakes nobody’s ever made before. Don’t freeze, don’t stop, don’t worry that it isn’t good enough, or it isn’t perfect, whatever it is: art, or love, or work or family or life.”
- Neil Gaiman, author
The Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) Program is complex. So much so, that this is the fourth article in the last six months that MMP has dedicated to this topic and January 1st, 2020 kicked off an entire year of Education and Testing before claims for advanced diagnostic imaging services may be denied.
AUC Program Background
The Protecting Access to Medicare Act (PAMA) of 2014, Section 218(b), established a new program to increase the rate of appropriate advanced diagnostic imaging services provided to Medicare beneficiaries.
Examples of such advanced imaging services include
- Computed tomography (CT),
- Positron Emission Tomography (PET),
- Nuclear Imaging, and
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI).
Settings this program applies to include
- Physician Offices
- Hospital Outpatient Departments (including emergency department)
- Ambulatory Surgical Centers (ASCs)
- Independent Diagnostic Testing Facilities
Program Applies to services paid under the following
- Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (MPFS),
- Hospital Outpatient Prospective Payment System (OPPS), and
- The Ambulatory Surgical Center (ASC) fee schedule.
CMS Allowed Exceptions to Participation in the Program
CMS does allow exceptions to participation in the program to the following:
- Ordering professionals with a significant hardship (such as limited access to the internet, etc.),
- Patients with an emergency medical condition (note, you can read more about what is considered to be an emergency medical condition in a related MMP article), and
- Inpatient paid under Medicare Part A.
Qualified Decision Support Mechanisms
Under this program, at the time a practitioner orders an advanced diagnostic imaging service for a Medicare beneficiary, he/she, or clinical staff acting under his/her direction, will be required to consult a qualified Clinical Decision Support Mechanism (CDSM). CDSMs are electronic portals through which appropriate use criteria (AUC) is accessed. The CDSM will determine whether or not the imaging order adheres to the AUC, or if there is no AUC available to address a patient’s clinical condition. The CMS AUC Program Webpage includes a table of the current Qualified CDSMs available.
AUC Program Purpose
Per CMS, the purpose of this program is to enable physicians, other practitioners, and facilities ordering advanced diagnostic imaging services and/or furnishing Part B advanced diagnostic imaging services to order the most appropriate test for their patient. CMS will use data collected from the program to identify outlier ordering professionals who will become subject to prior authorization.
Hospital Compare: Use of Medical Imaging Measure
AUC Program Priority Clinical Areas are defined in 42 CFR 414.94(b) as clinical conditions, diseases or symptom complexes and associated advanced diagnostic imaging services identified by CMS through annual rulemaking and in consultation with stakeholders. Priority Clinical Areas as of November 2016 includes:
- Coronary Artery Disease (suspected or diagnosed),
- Suspected Pulmonary Embolism,
- Headache (traumatic and nontraumatic),
- Hip pain,
- Low Back Pain,
- Shoulder Pain (to include suspected rotator cuff injury),
- Cancer of the lung (primary or metastatic, suspected or diagnoses), and
- Cervical or neck pain.
Hospital Compare’s Use of Medical Imaging Measure is an outpatient imaging efficiency measure providing information about hospitals’ use of medical imaging tests (like mammograms, MRIs, and CT scans) for outpatients. One goal of this measure is to avoid risk, stress, and cost of doing imaging tests that patients may not need.
The AUC Program Priority Clinical Area of Low Back Pain is also a Use of Medical Imaging Measure on Hospital Compare. More specifically, outpatients with low back pain who had an MRI without trying recommended treatments (like physical therapy) first.
The standard of care in patients with low back pain is to start with treatment like physical therapy or chiropractic care, and have MRI only if the treatment doesn’t help. CMS notes if the number of MRIs is high, it may mean the facility is doing too many unnecessary MRIs for low back pain. Below is a screen shot of three hospitals in the Birmingham market highlighting how they compare to each other, the state of Alabama and the Nation. Findings in this table reflect Medicare Fee-For-Service outpatient claims from July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018.
![](https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/602d338c7ad04ebab6ab9a28/6061e9e50d80e076c6b69774_appUse200122.png)
As evidenced in this graph, the entire state of Alabama is above the National Average, meaning facilities may be doing too many unnecessary MRIs for low-back pain.
January 1, 2020: Education and Operations Testing Period Begins
Providers are encouraged to participate during the testing period, but claims will not be denied for lack of AUC claim elements. Earlier this month CMS released MLN Article SE20002 specifically for institutional providers providing guidance for processing claims subject to the AUC program. The K3 segment will be used to report line level ordering professional information on institutional claims.
In 2020, CMS expects ordering professionals to begin consulting CDSMs and provide this information to furnishing practitioners and providers for reporting on their claims. Note, modifier MH can be utilized by furnishing practitioners and providers when they do not receive AUC-related information from the ordering professional.
I strongly encourage key stakeholders to read this MLN article as it includes advanced diagnostic imaging UB-04 examples.
Additional Resources
While mistakes will invariably happen with such a complex process, I leave you with a few additional resources to hopefully prevent too many truly glorious, amazing mistakes.
- MMP September 24, 2019 Article: Tips on Implementing Appropriate Use Criteria http://www.mmplusinc.com/news-articles/item/tips-on-implementing-appropriate-use-criteria
- MLN Fact Sheet: Appropriate Use Criteria for Advanced Diagnostic Imaging https://www.cms.gov/Outreach-and-Education/Medicare-Learning-Network-MLN/MLNProducts/Downloads/AUCDiagnosticImaging-909377.pdf
- MLN MM11268: Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) for Advanced Diagnostic Imaging – Educations and Operations Testing Period – Claims Processing Requirements https://www.cms.gov/Outreach-and-Education/Medicare-Learning-Network-MLN/MLNMattersArticles/downloads/MM11268.pdf
Fiscal Year 2019 Estimated Improper Payment Rates
In mid-November, CMS published a CMS.gov Fact Sheet detailing the estimated improper payment rates for CMS Programs for Fiscal Year (FY) 2019. Approximately 50,000 claims were sampled and included claims submitted from July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018. The following tables highlights an improper payment rate compare of FY 2018 to FY 2019.
Audit findings are used to calculate a Medicare Fee-for-Service (FFS) program improper payment rate. “The CERT program considers any claim that was paid when it should have been denied or paid at another amount (including both overpayments and underpayments) to be an improper payment.”
CMS reminds the reader in the Fact Sheet that improper payment rates are not necessarily indicative of or are measures of fraud. Instead, improper payments are payments that did not meet statutory, regulatory, administrative, or other legally applicable requirements and may be overpayments or underpayments.”
Fiscal Year 2019 Supplemental Improper Payment Data
A month later on December 12, 2019, CMS released the Supplemental Improper Payment Data Report that delves into the details behind the final Improper Payment Rate and Improper Payments. This report includes a review of claims submitted from July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018.
Common Causes of Improper Payments
Below is a table comparing the common causes of improper payments broken out by the type of error. The biggest shift from 2018 to 2019 was an increase in incorrect coding.
“0 or 1 Day” LOS Claims Continued Outlier
The CERT Program has reported Projected Improper Payments by Length of Stay (LOS) since the 2014 Report. Unlike the past three years where the Improper Payment Rate dropped for “0 or 1 day” LOS claims, for 2019 the improper payment rate increased.
Compliance with Short Stays
In addition to the CERT, the two Beneficiary and Family Centered Care Quality Improvement Organizations (BFCC-QIOs) (KEPRO and LIVANTA) have historically been tasked with performing Short Stay Reviews. However, on May 8, 2019 BFCC-QIO Short Stay Reviews were stopped while CMS took action to procure a new BFCC-QIO contractor to perform Short Stay Reviews on a national basis. CMS anticipated issuing a contract award by the 3rd quarter of calendar year 2019. To date, CMS has yet to announce a contract awardee. In the meantime, have you tracked your short stay volume overall, by MS-DRG or Physician over time? Do you know if your hospital is an outlier? Where can you look to find these answers?
PEPPER
One resource available to hospitals is the Short-Term Acute Care PEPPER (Program for Evaluating Payment Patterns Electronic Report). The PEPPER is made available to hospitals on a quarterly basis and compares your hospital to your state, MAC Jurisdiction and the nation. One-day Stays for Medical and Surgical MS-DRGs are two of the “Target Areas” at risk for improper payments included in this report.
The PEPPER provides the following suggested interventions for high One-day Stays Hospitals: “This could indicate that there are unnecessary admissions related to inappropriate use of admission screening criteria or outpatient observation. A sample of same- and/or one-day stay cases should be reviewed to determine if inpatient admission was necessary or if care could have been provided more efficiently on an outpatient basis (e.g., outpatient observation). Hospitals may generate data profiles to identify same- and/or one-day stays sorted by DRG, physician or admission source to assist in identification of any patterns related to same- and/or one-day stays. Hospitals may also wish to identify whether patients admitted for same- and/or one- day stays were treated in outpatient, outpatient observation or the emergency department for one or more nights prior to the inpatient admission. Hospitals should not review same- and/or one- day stays that are associated with procedures designated by CMS as “inpatient only.”
RealTime Medicare Data
Another source that can help assist you is our sister company, RealTime Medicare Data (RTMD). RTMD collects over 800 million Medicare Fee-for-Service paid claims annually from 38 states and the District of Columbia, and allows for searching of over 9 billion historical claims. In response to the “Two-Midnight” Policy, RTMD has available in their suite of Inpatient Hospital reports a One Day Stay Report. To give you a true picture of your “at risk” volume, this report excludes claims with a discharge status for Expired (20), left against medical advice (07), hospice (50 & 51) and /or were transferred to another Acute care facility (02). This report enables a hospital to view one day stay paid claims data by DRG and Physician to direct where audits should be focused. For further information on all that RTMD has to offer you can visit their website at www.rtmd.org.
Beth Cobb
MEDICARE TRANSMITTALS – RECURRING UPDATES
Quarterly Update to the National Correct Coding Initiative (NCCI) Procedure-to-Procedure (PTP) Edits, Version 26.0, Effective January 1, 2020
International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10) and Other Coding Revisions to National Coverage Determination (NCDs)--April 2020 Update
A maintenance update of ICD-10 conversions and other coding updates specific to National Coverage Determinations (NCDs). These NCD coding changes are the result of newly available codes, coding revisions to NCDs released separately, or coding feedback received.
2020 Annual Update to the Therapy Code List
Updates the list of codes that sometimes or always describe therapy services.
2020 Annual Update of Per-Beneficiary Threshold Amounts
Updates the annual per-beneficiary incurred expenses amounts now called the KX modifier thresholds and related policy for CY 2020.
Claim Status Category and Claim Status Codes Update
https://www.cms.gov/files/document/mm11467
Remittance Advice Remark Code (RARC), Claims Adjustment Reason Code (CARC), Medicare Remit Easy Print (MREP) and PC Print Update
https://www.cms.gov/files/document/mm11489
Update to Medicare Deductible, Coinsurance and Premium Rates for Calendar Year (CY) 2020
https://www.cms.gov/files/document/MM11542
OTHER MEDICARE TRANSMITTALS
Addition of Medical Severity Diagnosis Related Groups (MS-DRG) Subject to Inpatient Prospective Payment System (IPPS) Replaced Devices Offered Without Cost or With a Credit Policy
Medicare Severity Diagnosis-Related Groups (MS-DRGs) 319 and 320 (Other Endovascular Cardiac Valve Procedures with and without major complications and comorbidities (MCC), respectively) added to the list of MS-DRGs subject to the policy for replaced devices offered without cost or with a credit.
Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Database (MPFSDB) Update to Status Indicators
Status Indicator Q (therapy functional information code) is no longer effective with the 2020 MPFSDB beginning January 1, 2020. Medicare no longer requires functional therapy reporting.
Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Scan - Allow Tracer Codes Q9982 and Q9983 in the Fiscal Intermediary Shared System (FISS)
Currently, the system does not recognize HCPCS Q9982 and Q9983 as valid radiopharmaceutical tracer codes and claims are incorrectly returned to the provider as unprocessed or rejected.
Updating FISS Editing for Practice Locations to Bypass Mobile Facility and/or Portable Units and Services Rendered in the Patient's Home
Implements the newly approved National Uniform Billing Committee (NUBC) Condition Code “A7” and improved edit criteria in Medicare systems to bypass edits that match service facility location on certain hospital claims.
https://www.cms.gov/files/document/mm11470
Summary of Policies in the Calendar Year (CY) 2020 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (MPFS) Final Rule, Telehealth Originating Site Facility Fee Payment Amount and Telehealth Services List, CT Modifier Reduction List, and Preventive Services List
A summary of the policies in the CY 2020 MPFS Final Rule, announces the Telehealth Originating Site Facility Fee payment amount and makes other policy changes related to Medicare Part B payment.
https://www.cms.gov/files/document/mm11560
Medicare Claims Processing Manual Chapter 23 - Fee Schedule Administration and Coding Requirements
Updates language pertaining to the National Correct Coding Initiative (NCCI).
https://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Guidance/Transmittals/2019Downloads/R4465CP.pdf
Update to Medicare Claims Processing Manual, Chapters 1, 23 and 35
New Global Billing and Separate TC/PC billing instructions. For both paper and electronic claims, when a global diagnostic service code is billed (for example, no modifier TC and no modifier -26), the address where the TC was performed must be reported on the claim.
https://www.cms.gov/files/document/mm10882
REVISED MEDICARE TRANSMITTALS
April 2019 Update of the Hospital Outpatient Prospective Payment System (OPPS)
Revision - Reference added to a related article SE19009 which replaces Section 6 - Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T- Cell Therapy - instructions on pages 5-7 of this article.
Implementation to Exchange the List of Electronic Medical Documentation Requests (eMDR) for Registered Providers via the Electronic Submission of Medical Documentation (esMD) System
Revision - Updates and clarifies information regarding the eMDR registration/enrollment to indicate the provider and the HIH roles with more detail.
Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) for Advanced Diagnostic Imaging – Educational and Operations Testing Period - Claims Processing Requirements
Revision - Removes codes that are not available for 2020.
MEDICARE COVERAGE UPDATES
Proposed Decision Memo for Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) for Medicare Beneficiaries with Advanced Cancer
Expands coverage of Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) as a diagnostic laboratory test when performed in a CLIA-certified laboratory, when ordered by a treating physician and when specified requirements are met.
MEDICARE PRESS RELEASES AND FACT SHEETS
CMS Hospital Value-Based Purchasing Program Results for Fiscal Year 2020
The Hospital VBP Program works by adjusting what Medicare pays hospitals under the Inpatient Prospective Payment System (IPPS) based on the quality and cost of inpatient care the hospitals provide to patients.
MEDICARE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES
Palmetto GBA 2020 Medical Review (MR) Hot Topic Targeted Probe and Educate (TPE) Teleconference Schedule
Palmetto GBA will host a series of Medical Review Hot Topic Targeted Probe and Educate (TPE) Teleconferences in 2020.
https://www.palmettogba.com/palmetto/providers.nsf/ls/JJ%20Part%20A"BGQT2X1030?opendocument
Medicare Fast Facts
Medicare Fast Facts resources this month include:
- Bill Correctly for Medicare Telehealth Services
OTHER MEDICARE UPDATES
Extension of Detailed Notice of Discharge Beyond Expiration Date
The currently available Detailed Notice of Discharge (hospital notice) has an expiration date of October 31, 2019. The current notice is covered under an extension and hospitals should continue using it until CMS publishes the updated notice.
https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-General-Information/BNI/HospitalDischargeAppealNotices
2020 Outpatient Prospective Payment System/Ambulatory Surgical Center Final Rule
This final rule with comment period revises the Medicare hospital outpatient prospective payment system (OPPS) and the Medicare ambulatory surgical center (ASC) payment system for Calendar Year 2020.
https://s3.amazonaws.com/public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2019-24138.pdf
2020 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Final Rule
This major final rule addresses: changes to the physician fee schedule (PFS); other changes to Medicare Part B payment policies to ensure that payment systems are updated to reflect changes in medical practice, relative value of services, and changes in the statute; and other topics.
https://s3.amazonaws.com/public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2019-24086.pdf
Patients over Paperwork Newsletter November 2019
Through “Patients over Paperwork,” CMS established an internal process to evaluate and streamline regulations with a goal to reduce unnecessary burden, to increase efficiencies, and to improve the beneficiary experience.
https://www.cms.gov/files/document/november-2019-patients-over-paperwork-newsletter
KEPRO Case Review Connections Winter 2020 – Acute Care Edition
KEPRO is the Beneficiary and Family Centered Care QIO (BFCC-QIO) for 29 states. Case Review Connections is a quarterly newsletter that provides a glimpse into KEPRO and the services provided, along with success stories and updates from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).
https://keproqio.com/bene/newsletter/2020winteracute/
Hospital Price Transparency Requirements Final Rule
Establishes requirements for hospitals operating in the United States to establish, update, and make public a list of their standard charges for the items and services that they provide.
https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/cms-1717-f2.pdf
Transparency in Coverage Proposed Rule
Sets forth proposed requirements for group health plans and health insurance issuers in the individual and group markets to disclose cost-sharing information upon request, to a participant, beneficiary, or enrollee (or his or her authorized representative), including an estimate of such individual’s cost-sharing liability for covered items or services furnished by a particular provider.
https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/cms-9915-p.pdf
CY 2020 - Clinical Laboratory Fee Schedule Test Codes Final Determinations
In November of each year, CMS finalizes the basis of payment for new and substantially revised test codes and the amount of payment through the annual CMS instruction implementing the updated CLFS for the next CY.
Payment for Outpatient Clinic Visit Services at Excepted Off-Campus Provider-Based Departments
Revised Hospital Outpatient Prospective Payment System Pricer to update the rates being applied to claim lines for clinic visit services at excepted off-campus PBDs for 2019.
Extension of the MOON Beyond Expiration Date
The currently available Medicare Outpatient Observation Notice (MOON) has an expiration date of December 31, 2019. The currently available MOON is covered under an extension and hospitals should continue using the current notice until CMS publishes the updated notice.
https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-General-Information/BNI/MOON
In an October 21, 2019 CMS Blog, Seema Verma, Administrator for the Centers of Medicare and Medicaid Services, outlined CMS’s vision to modernize “program integrity methods to better protect taxpayers from fraud, waste and abuse in Medicare.” In the blog, program integrity is defined as “pay it right.”
Government watchdog, “the Government Accountability Office (GAO) has designated Medicare as a High Risk program since 1990 because of its size, complexity and susceptibility to improper payments.” One recommendation by the GAO has been for Congress to expand prior authorization in Fee-For-Service (FFS).
Outpatient Department Prior Authorization Requirement
A step in this direction can be found in the CY 2020 OPPS Final Rule in which CMS states that, “as part of our responsibility to protect the Medicare Trust Funds, we routinely analyze data associated with all facets of the Medicare program.” Analysis of 1.1 billion outpatient claims over an 11-year period of data from 2007 through 2011 identified a significant increase in the utilization volume of some covered Outpatient Department services. Most of these services fell within the following five categories:
- Blepharoplasty,
- Botulinum toxin injections,
- Panniculectomy,
- Rhinoplasty, and
- Vein ablation.
Procedures in these categories are often considered cosmetic and would not be covered by Medicare. CMS indicates “we are unaware of other factors that might contribute to clinically valid increased in volume. Therefore, these above-average increases in volume suggest an increase in unnecessary utilization.” In the Final Rule CMS implemented prior authorization requirements for these five services when performed in an outpatient department. This new requirement has an implementation date of July 1, 2020. You can learn more about this new requirement in a related article in next week’s Wednesday@One.
CMS Modernizing Their Approach to Program Integrity
Although Medicare’s improper payment rates have declined, Administrator Verma notes they remain too high. In response, CMS “is developing a five-pillar program integrity strategy to modernize out approach and protect Medicare for future generations.”
Pillar 1: Stopping Bad Actors
CMS partners with the Office of Inspector General (OIG), Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Unified Program Integrity Contractors (UPICs) to “deliberate on potential healthcare fraud cases, quickly direct them to law enforcement, and take appropriate administrative action such as payment suspensions and revocations.”
Pillar 2: Preventing Fraud
CMS is focused on moving away from the “pay and chase” model by “improving infrastructure that prevents fraud, waste and abuse on the front end.” Once a bad actor and his or her scheme is identified system changes are made to avoid future activities. One example cited by Administrator Verma was the September 2019 takedown of defendants in an orthotic braces scam.
Pillar 3: Mitigating Emerging Programmatic Risks
Administrator Verma likens mitigating risk to “playing the world’s largest game of whack-a-mole.” In keeping with this theme, the prior authorization requirement for a list of high-risk durable medical equipment, prosthetics, orthotics and supplies (DMEPOS) items, is “whacking” one mole in the game.
Pillar 4: Reducing Provider Burden
Provider education is a large part of the Targeted Probe and Educate (TPE) program. “Since its inception in 2009, the program has played a major role in reducing improper payments, recouping more than $10 billion for the Medicare program.”
The TPE program has also highlighted provider burden and confusing policies. In response CMS is working on developing a prototype Medicare FFS Documentation Requirement Lookup Service. You can read more about this effort on the CMS Documentation Requirement Lookup Service Initiative webpage.
Administrator Verma described additional ways that CMS is focusing on reducing provider burden and noted “cumulatively, these efforts are defining a new approach to program integrity that reduces burden and increased education to achieve a better shared understanding of how the programs operate.”
Pillar 5: Leveraging New Technology
CMS looks to adopt cutting edge technology – “such as AI and machine learning tools,” to save taxpayers more money and enable them to review more claims.
The Future of Medicare Program Integrity
Administrator Verma aptly summarizes the vision for the future of program integrity in one sentence. “CMS must elevate program integrity, unleash the power of modern private sector innovation, prevent rather than chase fraud waste and abuse through smart, proactive measures, and unburden our provider partners so they can do what they do best – put patients first.”
Beth Cobb
Yes! Help me improve my Medicare FFS business.
Please, no soliciting.