Knowledge Base Category -
TRANSMITTALS
New Physician Specialty Code for Hospitalist
- MLN Matters® Number: MM9716
- Related Change Request (CR) #: CR 9716
- Related CR Release Date: October 28, 2016
- Effective Date: April 1, 2017
- Related CR Transmittal #: R3637CP and R274FM
- Implementation Date: April 3, 2017
- Affects physicians, other providers, and suppliers submitting claims to Medicare Administrative Contractors (MACs) for services to Medicare beneficiaries.
- https://www.cms.gov/Outreach-and-Education/Medicare-Learning-Network-MLN/MLNMattersArticles/Downloads/MM9716.pdf
Summary: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has established a new physician specialty code for Hospitalist (C6).
Modifications to the National Coordination of Benefits Agreement Crossover Process
- MLN Matters® Number: MM9681
- Related Change Request (CR) #: CR 9681
- Related CR Release Date: October 27, 2016
- Effective Date: April 1, 2017
- Related CR Transmittal #: R1733OTN
- Implementation Date: April 3, 2017
- Affects providers, including hospices, submitting institutional claims to Medicare Administrative Contractors (MACs) requiring Coordination of Benefits (COB) for services provided to Medicare beneficiaries.
- https://www.cms.gov/Outreach-and-Education/Medicare-Learning-Network-MLN/MLNMattersArticles/Downloads/MM9681.pdf
Summary: Modifies the Part A shared system to ensure that all 837 institutional Coordination of Benefits (COB) claims will contain a Claim Adjustment Reason Code and Remittance Advice Remark Code combination, that hospital day counts may not be entered duplicatively on incoming claims submissions to Medicare, and that Present on Admission (POA) indicators are only permitted on incoming inpatient hospital-oriented claims.
Instructions to Process Services Not Authorized by the Veterans Administration (VA) in a Non-VA Facility Reported with Value Code (VC) 42
- MLN Matters® Number: MM9818
- Related Change Request (CR) #: CR 9818
- Related CR Release Date: October 28, 2016
- Effective Date: October 1, 2013
- Related CR Transmittal #: R3635CP
- Implementation Date: April 3, 2017
- Affects hospitals and skilled nursing facilities who submit inpatient claims to Medicare Administrative Contractors (MACs) for services provided to Medicare beneficiaries.
- https://www.cms.gov/Outreach-and-Education/Medicare-Learning-Network-MLN/MLNMattersArticles/Downloads/MM9818.pdf
Summary: Clarifies how Medicare contractors shall process inpatient claims for services in a Non-VA facility that were not authorized by the VA.
Issuing Compliance Letters to Specific Providers and Suppliers Regarding Inappropriate Billing of Qualified Medicare Beneficiaries (QMBs) for Medicare Cost-Sharing
- MLN Matters®Number: MM9817
- Related Change Request (CR) #: CR 9817
- Related CR Release Date: November 4, 2016
- Effective Date: December 6, 2016
- Related CR Transmittal #: R1747OTN
- Implementation Date: March 8, 2017
- Affects providers submitting claims to Medicare Administrative Contractors (MACs) and Durable Medical Equipment MACs (DME MACs) for services provided to certain Medicare beneficiaries.
- https://www.cms.gov/Outreach-and-Education/Medicare-Learning-Network-MLN/MLNMattersArticles/Downloads/MM9817.pdf
Summary: Federal law bars Medicare providers from charging individuals enrolled in the Qualified Medicare Beneficiary Program (QMB) for Medicare Part A and B deductibles, coinsurances, or copays. Change Request (CR) 9817 instructs MACs to issue a compliance letter instructing named providers and suppliers to refund any erroneous charges and recall any past or existing billing with regard to improper QMB billing.
Therapy Cap Values for Calendar Year (CY) 2017
- MLN Matters® Number: MM9865
- Related Change Request (CR) #: CR 9865
- Related CR Release Date: November 4, 2016
- Effective Date: January 1, 2017
- Related CR Transmittal #: R3644CP
- Implementation Date: January 3, 2017
- Affects physicians, therapists, and other providers submitting claims to Medicare Administrative Contractors (MACs), including Home Health & Hospice MACs, for outpatient therapy services provided to Medicare beneficiaries.
- https://www.cms.gov/Outreach-and-Education/Medicare-Learning-Network-MLN/MLNMattersArticles/Downloads/MM9865.pdf
Summary: Describes the amounts and policies for outpatient therapy caps for CY 2017. For physical therapy and speech-language pathology combined, the 2017 therapy cap will be $1,980. For occupational therapy, the cap for 2017 will be $1,980.
Quarterly Update to the Correct Coding Initiative (CCI) Edits, Version 23.0, Effective January 1, 2017
- MLN Matters®Number: MM9847
- Related Change Request (CR) #: CR 9847
- Related CR Release Date: November 4, 2016
- Effective Date: January 1, 2017
- Related CR Transmittal #: R3646CP
- Implementation Date: January 3, 2017
- Affects physicians, providers, and suppliers submitting claims to Medicare Administrative Contractors (MACs) for services provided to Medicare beneficiaries.
- https://www.cms.gov/Outreach-and-Education/Medicare-Learning-Network-MLN/MLNMattersArticles/Downloads/MM9847.pdf
Summary: Instructs MACs of the normal update to the Correct Coding Initiative (CCI) Procedure to Procedure (PTP) edits, effective January 1, 2017.
Payment Reduction for X-Rays Taken Using Film
- MLN Matters®Number: MM9727
- Related Change Request (CR) #: CR 9727
- Related CR Release Date: August 12, 2016
- Effective Date: January 1, 2017
- Related CR Transmittal #: R3583CP
- Implementation Date: January 3, 2017
- Affects physicians, other providers, and suppliers who submit Part B claims to Medicare Administrative Contractors (MACs) for X-ray imaging services provided to Medicare beneficiaries.
- https://www.cms.gov/Outreach-and-Education/Medicare-Learning-Network-MLN/MLNMattersArticles/Downloads/MM9727.pdf
Summary: Reduces the technical component (TC) (including the TC portion of a global service) of X-ray imaging services provided using film.
2017 Annual Update to the Therapy Code List
- MLN Matters®Number: MM9782
- Related Change Request (CR) #: CR 9782
- Related CR Release Date: November 10, 2016
- Effective Date: January 1, 2017
- Related CR Transmittal #: R3654CP
- Implementation: January 3, 2017
- Affects physicians, therapists, and other providers, including Comprehensive Outpatient Rehabilitation Facilities (CORFs), submitting claims to Medicare Administrative Contractors (MACs), including Home Health & Hospice MACs, for outpatient therapy services provided to Medicare beneficiaries.
- https://www.cms.gov/Outreach-and-Education/Medicare-Learning-Network-MLN/MLNMattersArticles/Downloads/MM9782.pdf
Summary: Updates the therapy code list for Calendar Year (CY) 2017 by adding eight “always therapy” codes (97161 – 97168) for physical therapy (PT) and occupational therapy (OT) evaluative procedures and deletes the four codes currently used to report these services (97001 – 97004).
ICD-10 Coding Revisions to National Coverage Determination (NCDs)
- Transmittal 1755
- Date: November 18, 2016
- Change Request 9861
- https://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Guidance/Transmittals/Downloads/R1755OTN.pdf
Summary: The 10th maintenance update of ICD-10 conversions and other coding updates specific to national coverage determinations (NCDs). These NCD coding changes are the result of newly available codes, coding revisions to NCDs released separately, or coding feedback received.
Annual Update of HCPCS Codes Used for Home Health Consolidated Billing Enforcement
- MLN Matters®Number: MM9771
- Related Change Request (CR) #: CR 9771
- Related CR Release Date: October 7, 2016
- Effective Date: January 1, 2017
- Related CR Transmittal #: R3618CP
- Implementation Date: January 3, 2017
- Affects Home Health Agencies (HHAs) and other providers submitting claims to Medicare Administrative Contractors (MACs) for services to Medicare beneficiaries in a home health period of coverage.
- https://www.cms.gov/Outreach-and-Education/Medicare-Learning-Network-MLN/MLNMattersArticles/Downloads/MM9771.pdf
Summary: 2017 annual update to the list of HCPCS codes used by Medicare systems to enforce consolidated billing of home health services.
Office of Inspector General Report: Stem Cell Transplantation
- MLN Matters®Number: SE1624
- Article Release Date: November 22, 2016
- Affects providers billing Medicare Administrative Contractors (MACs) for services related to stem cell transplantation.
- https://www.cms.gov/Outreach-and-Education/Medicare-Learning-Network-MLN/MLNMattersArticles/Downloads/SE1624.pdf
Summary: Addresses issues of incorrect billing as a result of the February 2016 OIG report and clarifies coverage of stem cell transplantation.
MEDICARE HOSPITAL PAYMENT RULES
Hospital Inpatient Prospective System (IPPS) Final Rule Correction Notice
- October 31, 2016
- https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2016-10-31/pdf/2016-26182.pdf
Summary: This document corrects a typographical error in the final rule that appeared in the August 22, 2016 Federal Register as well as additional typographical errors in a related correction to that rule that appeared in the October 5, 2016 Federal Register.
Hospital Outpatient Prospective System (OPPS) and ASC Final Rule
- November 1, 2016
- http://tinyurl.com/gvm4vor
Summary: This final rule with comment period revises the Medicare hospital outpatient prospective payment system (OPPS) and the Medicare ambulatory surgical center (ASC) payment system for CY 2017 to implement applicable statutory requirements and changes arising from CMS’s continuing experience with these systems.
OTHER MEDICARE ANNOUNCEMENTS
2017 Medicare Parts A & B Premiums and Deductibles Announced
- November 10, 2016
- https://www.cms.gov/Newsroom/MediaReleaseDatabase/Press-releases/2016-Press-releases-items/2016-11-10-2.html
Summary: The 2017 premiums for the Medicare inpatient hospital (Part A) and physician and outpatient hospital services (Part B) programs.
New Recovery Auditor Contracts Awarded
- October 31, 2016 – CMS has awarded the next round of Medicare Fee-for-Service Recovery Audit Contractor (RAC) contracts to:
- Region 1 – Performant Recovery, Inc.
- Region 2 – Cotiviti, LLC
- Region 3 – Cotiviti, LLC
- Region 4 – HMS Federal Solutions
- Region 5 – Performant Recovery, Inc
- RAC Recent Updates webpage
The RACs in Regions 1-4 will perform postpayment review to identify and correct Medicare claims that contain improper payments (overpayments or underpayments) that were made under Part A and Part B, for all provider types other than Durable Medical Equipment, Prosthetics, Orthotics, and Supplies (DMEPOS) and Home Health/Hospice. The Region 5 RAC will be dedicated to the postpayment review of DMEPOS and Home Health/Hospice claims nationally.
CMS Hospital Value-Based Purchasing Program Results for Fiscal Year 2017
- November 1, 2016
- Adjustments to Medicare hospital payments based on the quality of care they provide to patients as determined by quality reporting
- 2017 VBP Fact Sheet
- Includes link to FY2017 Hospital VBP incentive payment adjustment factors
Fiscal Year 2017 HHS OIG Work Plan
- November 10, 2016
- https://oig.hhs.gov/reports-and-publications/workplan/index.asp
Summary: The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office of Inspector General (OIG) Work Plan for fiscal year (FY) 2017 summarizes new and ongoing reviews and activities that OIG plans to pursue with respect to HHS programs and operations during the current fiscal year and beyond.
America has a drug problem. (Actually more than one considering the rocketing costs of medicinal drugs for patients, payers, and providers, but that would be another article.) Today I am referring to the problem of drug abuse. There is an opioid epidemic fueled by the over-prescribing of pain medications; abuse of illicit drugs continues with newer, cheaper opium derivatives and combinations; and there is also the seemingly never-ending development of new synthetic drugs. Controlling the drug problem in America is a challenge for law enforcement and governmental authorities, but coding for drug testing is a challenge for healthcare providers. The coding challenge is fueled by the also seemingly never-ending changes to drug testing codes from CPT (published and copyrighted by the American Medical Association) and Medicare (HCPCS codes).
Drug testing codes have been changing for many years, but in 2015 CPT did a major overhaul of the drug testing codes. They developed new codes for presumptive drug testing (drug screening) based on testing methods and major groupings of drug classes (Drug Class Lists A and B), and new codes for definitive drug testing based on drug classes and tested by more complex methods. Medicare did not accept the new CPT drug testing code changes for 2015 and instead kept their existing drug screening codes, developed new HCPCS codes for some of the deleted CPT codes, and maintained the previous year’s CPT instructions for selection of other drug testing codes. As a reminder, Medicare’s drug screening codes were based on test complexity and the new HCPCS codes for 2015 were by drug name or class.
The year 2016 saw a complete revision in the HCPCS codes Medicare accepts for drug testing. They deleted all of the HCPCS codes from the previous year (G0431, G0434, and G6030-G6058) and developed a much simpler, straightforward system. The screening or presumptive drug testing codes (G0477-G0479) were based on the testing/reading method and device and the definitive drug testing codes (G0480-G0483) were based on the number of drug classes tested as defined by the CPT drug class definitions. Each new HCPCS code and type of drug testing code (presumptive or definitive) was only to be reported once per date of service and included sample validation testing. There were no drug testing code changes for CPT for 2016.
That brings us to 2017. CPT is changing the presumptive (screening) codes to basically mirror the HCPCS screening codes from 2016 based on testing/reading method and device. They are deleting CPT codes 80301-80304 and replacing them with:
- CPT Code 80305 – drug test(s), presumptive, any number of drug classes, any number of devices or procedures (eg, immunoassay); capable of being read by direct optical observation only (eg, dipsticks, cups, cards, cartridges) includes sample validation when performed, per date of service
- CPT Code 80306 – drug test(s), presumptive, any number of drug classes, any number of devices or procedures (eg, immunoassay); read by instrument assisted direct optical observation (eg, dipsticks, cups, cards, cartridges) includes sample validation when performed, per date of service
- CPT Code 80307 – drug test(s), presumptive, any number of drug classes, any number of devices or procedures, by instrument chemistry analyzers (eg, utilizing immunoassay [eg, EIA, ELISA, EMIT, FPIA, IA, KIMS, RIA]), chromatography (eg, GC, HPLC), and mass spectrometry either with or without chromatography, (eg, DART, DESI, GC-MS, GC-MS/MS, LC-MS, LC-MS/MS, LDTD, MALDI, TOF) includes sample validation when performed, per date of service
More simply stated:
- CPT 80305 is drug screening by dipsticks, cups, cards or cartridges read visually
- CPT 80306 is drug screening by dipsticks, cups, cards or cartridges read on an instrument reader
- CPT 80307 is drug screening on a chemistry analyzer
- Each code is only reported once per date of service regardless of the number of drugs tested
- The codes include sample validation testing such as pH, specific gravity, nitrites, etc.
CPT is not making any changes to the definitive drug testing codes (80320-80377) for 2017. These codes are only for complex testing methods that are able to identify individual drugs and distinguish between structural isomers, such as gas or liquid chromatography with mass spectrometry, and specifically EXCLUDE immunoassay and enzymatic testing methods. Each category of a drug class, including metabolite(s) if performed is reported once per date of service. This means each code (or each drug class if described by more than one code) is reported only once a day.
As usual, the Medicare Clinical Lab Fee Schedule (CLFS) Test Codes Final Determinations for the coming year are not available yet, so this discussion for HCPCS codes is based on the Preliminary Determinations (available here). Medicare plans to delete the 2016 HCPCS codes for presumptive testing and go with the above CPT codes for 2017 – not surprising since as stated above, the new CPT codes mirror last year’s HCPCS codes.
Medicare plans to keep their definitive HCPCS codes for 2017 and possibly add one more HCPCS code. Again as stated above, the existing codes (G0480-G0483) are based on the number of drug classes tested as defined by the CPT drug class definitions. And like the CPT definitive testing codes, they are reserved for complex testing methods and exclude testing by immunoassay or enzymatic methods. Medicare is considering increasing the payment rate for these codes for 2017, but remains concerned that “inappropriate testing continues to occur including simplified testing billed at the higher code with suspect results.” Therefore they are proposing a new HCPCS G code (yet to be named) for those labs that are performing a less sophisticated version of these tests than is usually performed in drug testing laboratories that would be paid the same as G0479/80307.
GCCCC: Drug test(s), definitive, utilizing drug identification methods able to identify individual drugs and distinguish between structural isomers (but not necessarily stereoisomers), including but not limited to GC/MS (any type, single or tandem) and LC/MS (any type, single or tandem), excluding immunoassays (eg, IA, EIA, ELISA, EMIT, FPIA) and enzymatic methods (eg, alcohol dehydrogenase), performed in a single machine run without drug or class specific calibrations; qualitative or quantitative, all sources, includes specimen validity testing, per day.
Another thing for hospitals to remember – the drug testing codes are assigned to Status Indicator “Q4.” This means that if they are performed and reported on the same claim with any other outpatient services, there is no separate payment for the drug testing, for example drug testing during an emergency department visit.
All providers also need to be sure the drug testing is medically necessary, especially related to definitive drug testing of multiple drugs, such as might be ordered from a pain clinic. According to a recent Department of Justice (DOJ) press release concerning a False Claims Act settlement, “The use of quantitative drug tests – tests that are very specific and also very expensive – is appropriate only if there is reason to doubt the more general and cheaper qualitative drug test screens.” There may be times when the treating physician needs to know a specific drug identification – in that case, the medical reason should be clearly documented in the medical record.
Providers need to be on the lookout for Medicare’s final determinations concerning drug testing codes. We will publish those updates in the Wednesday@One when available. Providers may also want to work with their physicians to ensure appropriate documentation to support the medical necessity of drug testing as this continues to be a Medicare concern – see Medicare’s Compliance Fact Sheet for Urine Drug Screening.
Debbie Rubio
Fall is my favorite time of year. How could it not be when kids are going back to school, college football returns, and although the summer heat lingers longer than I would like, we have some spectacular fall foliage. Everything I love about fall at the most basic is consistent from year to year but in truth brings about tremendous change. Maybe it’s my oldest nephew entering high school this year, or the first weekend of regular season football shattering the predictions in the football standings - at the end of the day one constant of fall is change.
The one constant I have seen in health care for more years than I care to think about now is change. Exhibit A: the ICD-10-CM Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting updates go into effect every fall on October 1st with the start of a new CMS Fiscal Year. In the update, narrative changes appear in bold text. However, with the FY 2017 Guidelines there are some significant changes, of which one in particular has sparked a lot of debate in the Coding and Clinical Documentation Community.
Key NARRATIVE Changes
“With”
“The word “with” should be interpreted to mean “associated with” or “due to” when it appears in a code title, the Alphabetic Index, or an instructional note in the Tabular List. The classification presumes a causal relationship between the two conditions linked by these terms in the Alphabetic Index or Tabular list. These conditions should be coded as related even in the absence of provider documentation explicitly linking them, unless the documentation clearly states the conditions are unrelated. For conditions not specifically linked by these relational terms in the classification, provider documentation must link the conditions in order to code them as related. The word “with” in the Alphabetic Index is sequenced immediately following the main term, not in alphabetical order.”
Code assignment and Clinical Criteria
The New addition to the guidelines, “Code assignment and Clinical Criteria,” is the “hot button” that has sparked much debate as to what this really means.
“The assignment of a diagnosis code is based on the provider’s diagnostic statement that the condition exists. The provider’s statement that the patient has a particular condition is sufficient. Code assignment is not based on clinical criteria used by the provider to establish the diagnosis.”
This guidance poses a real dilemma for Professional Coders and Clinical Documentation Improvement (CDI) Specialists as we include clinical indicators when constructing a query for the physician and government contractors have become notorious for denying a claim for lack of clinical indicators in the documentation supporting the coded diagnosis. Unfortunately, I have yet to see, read or hear about a good solution for this guidance.
Zika virus infections
- “Code only confirmed cases
Code only a confirmed diagnosis of Zika virus (A92.5, Zika virus disease) as documented by the provider. This is an exception to the hospital inpatient guidelines Section II, H.
In this context, “confirmation” does not require documentation of the type of test performed; the physician’s diagnostic statement that the condition is confirmed is sufficient. This code should be assigned regardless of the stated mode of transmission.
If the provider documents “suspected”, “possible” or “probable” Zika, do not assign code A92.5. Assign a code(s) explaining the reason for encounter (such as fever, rash, or joint pain) or Z20.828, Contact with and *suspected) exposure to other viral communicable diseases.”
Hypertension
With the transition to ICD-10 last October there was one code for Hypertension (I-10). There was no longer a way to differentiate when it was actually a “hypertensive crisis” or “hypertensive emergency.”
As of October 1, 2016, they are back.
“Hypertensive Crisis
Assign a code from category I16, Hypertensive crisis, for documented hypertensive urgency, hypertensive emergency or unspecified hypertensive crisis. Code also any identified hypertensive disease (I10-I15). The sequencing is based on the reason for the encounter.”
Documented Pressure Ulcer Stage
There are two new changes for 2017. First being for patients admitted with pressure ulcers documented as healing. “For ulcers that were present on admission but healed at the time of discharge, assign the code for the site and stage of the pressure ulcer at the time of admission.”
The second change is for the patient admitted with pressure ulcer evolving into another stage during the admission. “If a patient is admitted with a pressure ulcer at one stage and it progresses to a higher stage, two separate codes should be assigned: one code for the site and stage of the ulcer on admission and a second code for the same ulcer site and the highest stage reported during the stay.”
While I have highlighted a few of the key narrative changes, it is worth noting that there are over 40 narrative changes in the guidelines. Looking for specific changes also made me realize how many times the guidelines advise “when documentation is unclear the provider should be queried” (26 times).
From the CDI Specialist perspective the guidelines provide a good foundation for understanding and appreciating the coding conventions to which Coding Professionals must adhere. They are also an essential read for anyone preparing for the Certified Clinical Documentation Specialist (CCDS) exam.
I encourage Coding Professionals and CDI Specialists to read the entire document and be on the lookout for how to register for our fall Inpatient Coding Updates Webinar that is held annually in October.
Beth Cobb
TRANSMITTALS
October 2016 Integrated Outpatient Code Editor (I/OCE) Specifications Version 17.3
- Transmittal 3591, Change Request 9754, MLN Matters Article MM9754
- Issued 8-12-16, Effective 10-1-16, Implementation 10-3-16
- Affects providers who submit claims to Medicare Administrative Contractors MACs), including Home Health and Hospices (HH+H) MACs, for services provided to Medicare beneficiaries.
Summary of Changes: Quarterly update of the I/OCE. All institutional outpatient claims (which includes non-OPPS hospital claims) are routed through a single integrated OCE to apply claims processing edits.
Medicare Part B Clinical Laboratory Fee Schedule: Guidance to Laboratories for Collecting and Reporting Data for the Private Payor Rate-Based Payment System
- MLN Matters Article SE1619
- Issued 8-8-16
- Affects Medicare Part B clinical laboratories who submit claims to Medicare Administrative Contractors (MACs) for services furnished to Medicare beneficiaries.
Summary of Changes: This guidance includes clarifications for determining whether a laboratory meets the requirements to be an “applicable laboratory,” the applicable information (that is, private payor rate data) that must be collected and reported to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), the entity responsible for reporting applicable information to CMS, the data collection and reporting periods, and the schedule for implementing the new CLFS
Coding Revisions to National Coverage Determination (NCDs)
- Transmittal 1708, Change Request 9751, Transmittal 1708
- Issued 8-19-16, Effective 1-1-17 unless otherwise noted, Implementation 1-3-17
Summary of Changes: The 9th quarterly maintenance update of ICD-10 conversions and other coding updates specific to national coverage determinations (NCDs)
OTHER UPDATES
2017 ICD-10-CM and ICD-10-PCS 2017 Guidelines
- ICD-10-CM Guidelines are available on the CDC and CMS Websites http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/icd/icd10cm.htm and https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Coding/ICD10/2017-ICD-10-CM-and-GEMs.html
- ICD-10-PCS Guidelines on CMS Website https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Coding/ICD10/2017-ICD-10-PCS-and-GEMs.html
Summary of Changes: To easily identify what is new for the October 1, 2016 start date for the CMS 2017 Fiscal Year, narrative changes appear in bold text. The ICD-10-CM Preface for 2017 found on the CDC website indicates that “ICD-10-CM is the United States’ clinical modification of the World Health Organization’s ICD-10. The term “clinical” is used to emphasize the modification’s intent: to serve as a useful tool in the area of classification of morbidity data for indexing of health records, medical care review, and ambulatory and other health care programs, as well as for basic health statistics. To describe the clinical picture of the patient the codes must be more precise than those needed only for statistical groupings and trend analysis.”
Updates to the Clarifying Questions and Answers Related to the July 6, 2015, CMS/AMA Joint Announcement and Guidance Regarding ICD-10 Flexibilities for Physicians
- Questions & Answers pdf
- Released August 18, 2016
Summary of Changes: The ICD-1 flexibilities are set to expire October 1, 2016. Providers should already be coding to the highest level of specificity. The flexibilities were “solely for the purpose of contractors performing medical review so that they would not deny claims solely for the specificity of the ICD-10 code as long as there is no evidence of fraud.”
“The only way to make sense out of change is to plunge into it, move with it, and join the dance.”- Alan Watts
This week we conclude our in-depth analysis of the 2017 IPPS Final Rule by taking a plunge into finalized changes to Medicare Severity Diagnosis-Related Group (MS-DRG) Classifications broken down by Major Diagnostic Categories (MDCs).
Pre-Major Diagnostic Category (Pre MDC)
Total Artificial Heart Replacement
The proposal to assign ICD-10-PCS procedure codes 02RK0JZ and 02RL0JZ as a code cluster to ICD–10 Version 34 MS–DRGs 001 and 002 (Heart Transplant or Implant of Heart Assist System with and without MCC, respectively) to accurately replicate the Version 32 ICD–9–CM based MS–DRG logic of procedure code 37.52 was finalized.
MDC1: Diseases and Disorders of the Nervous System
Mechanical Complication Codes
In the proposed rule CMS agreed with a requestor that ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes T85.610A, T85.620A, T85.630A, and T85.690A describe conditions occurring within the nervous system. These ICD-10 diagnosis codes describe concepts not previously captured by the ICD-9-CM. As a result, CMS finalized the reassignment of these four ICD–10–CM diagnosis codes from MDC 21 under MS–DRGs 919, 920, and 921 to MDC 1 under MS–DRGs 091, 092, and 093. The official code titles were revised after publication of the Proposed Rule. The new ICD-10 code titles are as follow:
MDC 4: Diseases and Disorders of the Ear, Nose, Mouth and Throat
Reassignment of Diagnosis Code R22.2
The proposal to reassign ICD–10–CM diagnosis code R22.2 (Localized Swelling, Mass and Lump, Trunk) from MDC 4 to MDC 9 under MS–DRGs 606 and 607 (Minor Skin Disorders with and without MCC, respectively) was finalized.
MDC 5: Diseases and Disorders of the Circulatory System
Implant of Loop Recorder
The proposal to re-designate the following four ICD–10–PCS codes from non-O.R. to O.R. procedures within Appendix E of the Version 34 ICD–10 MS–DRG Definitions Manual was finalized.
- 0JH602Z (Insertion of monitoring device into chest subcutaneous tissue and fascia, open approach);
- 0JH632Z (Insertion of monitoring device into chest subcutaneous tissue and fascia, percutaneous approach);
- 0JWT02Z (Revision of monitoring device in trunk subcutaneous tissue and fascia, open approach); and
- 0JWT32Z (Revision of monitoring device in trunk subcutaneous tissue and fascia, percutaneous approach).
Endovascular Thrombectomy of the Lower Limbs
CMS agreed with a commenter that procedures describing endovascular thrombectomy of the lower limbs should be assigned to ICD–10 MS–DRGs 270, 271, and 272. CMS finalized their proposal to restructure the ICD–10–PCS MS–DRG configuration and add 20 of the proposed ICD–10–PCS code translations (which would capture procedures describing endovascular thrombectomy of the lower limbs) to ICD–10–PCS Version 34 (The code table can be found on page 56804 of the final rule.)
Pacemaker Procedure Codes Combinations
The proposal to modify the ICD-10 MS-DRG logic to capture a wider range of possible reported procedure codes describing procedures involving both a pacemaker device and leads was finalized.
Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair with Implant
Proposals finalized:
- Collapse MS-DRGs 228, 229, and 230 from three severity levels by deleting MS-DRG 230 and revising MS-DRG 229,
- ICD-9-CM procedure code 35.97 and the cases reporting ICD-10-PCS procedure code 02UG3JZ (Supplement mitral valve with synthetic substitute, percutaneous approach) will be reassigned from MS–DRGs 273 and 274 to MS–DRG 228 and revised MS–DRG 229,
- The title of revised MS-DRG 229 is now “Other Cardiothoracic Procedures without MCC”; and
- The title for MS–DRG 228 will remain “Other Cardiothoracic Procedures with MCC.”
MDC 6: Diseases and Disorders of the Digestive System
Excision of Ileum
CMS received a request to analyze an MS-DRG replication issue. Under ICD–9, procedure code 45.62 (Other partial resection of small intestine) was assigned to MS–DRGs 329, 330 and 331 (Major Small and Large Bowel Procedures with MCC, with CC, and without CC/MCC, respectively).
Under the current ICD–10 MS–DRGs Version 33, ICD–10–PCS procedure code 0DBB0ZZ (Excision of ileum, open approach) is assigned to MS–DRGs 347, 348, and 349 (Anal and Stomal Procedures with MCC, with CC, and without CC/MCC, respectively). The requestor indicated that, despite the variation in terms for ‘‘excision’’ and ‘‘resection’’ between the two code sets, the surgical procedure to remove a portion of the small intestine, whether it is the ileum, duodenum, or jejunum, has not changed and should not result in different MS–DRG assignments when translated from ICD–9–CM to ICD–10. CMS agreed that this is a replication error.
Additionally, CMS reviewed the MS–DRG assignments for ICD–10–PCS code 0DBA0ZZ (Excision of jejunum, open approach) and determined the MS–DRG assignment for this code resulted in the same replication error.
As a result of analysis, CMS proposed and finalized the reassignment of ICD–10–PCS codes 0DBB0ZZ and 0DBA0ZZ from MS–DRGs 347, 348, and 349 (Anal and Stomal Procedures with MCC, with CC, and without CC/MCC, respectively) to MS–DRGs 329, 330, and 331 (Major Small and Large Bowel Procedures with MCC, with CC, and without CC/MCC, respectively), effective with the ICD–10 MS–DRGs Version 34 on October 1, 2016.
MDC 7: Diseases and Disorders of the Hepatobiliary System and Pancreas
Bypass Procedures of the Veins
A requestor noted that currently, ICD–10–PCS procedure code 06183DY (Bypass portal vein to lower vein with intraluminal device, percutaneous approach) is assigned to only MDC 5 (Diseases and Disorders of the Circulatory System) and MS–DRGs 270, 271, and 272 (Other Major Cardiovascular Procedures with MCC, with CC, and without CC/MCC, respectively) under ICD–10 MS–DRGs Version 33.
The requestor stated that the code should also be assigned to MDC 7 and MS–DRGs 405, 406, and 407 to be consistent with the ICD–9–CM MS–DRGs Version 32. CMS analyzed this issue and agreed and finalized the assignment of ICD–10–PCS procedure code 06183DY to MDC 7 and MS–DRGs 405, 406, and 407 for FY 2017.
MDC 8: Diseases and Disorders of the Musculoskeletal System and Connective Tissue
Combination Codes for Removal and Replacement of Knee Joints
CMS examined knee joint revision combination codes that are not currently assigned to MS–DRGs 466, 467, and 468 (Revision of Hip or Knee Replacement with MCC, with CC, and without CC/MCC, respectively) in ICD–10 MS–DRGs Version 33 and identified 58 additional combinations that also should be included so that the same logic is used in the ICD–10 version of the MS–DRGs as is used in the ICD–9–CM version. CMS finalized the addition of these 58 new code combinations that capture the joint revisions to the Version 34 MS DRG structure for MS–DRGs 466, 467, and 468, effective October 1, 2016. The table of new combination codes begins on page 56821 of the Final Rule.
Decompression Laminectomy
Currently, under ICD–10–PCS, the procedure describing a decompression laminectomy is coded for the ‘‘release’’ of a specified area of the spinal cord. These decompression codes are assigned to MS–DRGs 028, 029, and 030 (Spinal Procedures with MCC, with CC or Spinal Neurostimulators, or without CC/MCC, respectively) and to MS–DRGs 518, 519, and 520 (Back and Neck
Procedures Except Spinal Fusion with MCC or Disc Device or Neurostimulator, with CC, or without CC/MCC, respectively) in the ICD–10 MS–DRGs Version 33.
A commenter brought attention to the fact that codes describing release of specific peripheral nerve are assigned to MS–DRGs 515, 516, and 517 (Other Musculoskeletal System and Connective Tissue O.R. Procedures with MCC, with CC, and without C/MCC, respectively). The commenter suggested that a subset of these codes also be assigned to MS–DRGs 028 through 030 and MS–DRGs 518 through 520 for clinical coherence purposes.
CMS agreed with the commenter’s suggestion and CMS proposed to reassign 18 ICD–10–PCS procedure codes from MS–DRGs 515 through 517 to MS–DRGs 028 through 030 and MS–DRGs 518 through 520 under the ICD–10 MS–DRGs Version 34.
This change was delayed in the Final Rule, “until the ICD-10 claims data are available, because we will have the ability to better analyze the impact of reassigning the specified codes according to their anatomic locations, as well as receive clarification regarding which specific codes should be taken under consideration for reassignment.”
Lordosis
A replication issue involving four diagnosis codes related to lordosis (excessive curvature of the lower spine) was discovered in MS-DRGs 446,457, and 458 (Spinal Fusion Except Cervical with Spinal Curvature or Malignancy or Infection or Extensive Fusions with MCC, with CC, and without CC/MCC).
These MS–DRGs contain specific logic requiring a principal diagnosis describing a spinal curvature, a malignancy, or infection or a secondary diagnosis that describes a spinal curvature disorder related to another condition.
Under the ICD–10 MS–DRGs Version 33, the following diagnosis codes were listed on the principal diagnosis list and the secondary diagnosis list for MS–DRGs 456, 457, and 458:
After consideration CMS finalized maintaining these four codes in the logic for the principal diagnosis list but to remove them from the secondary diagnosis list.
MDC 13: Diseases and Disorders of the Female Reproductive System
Pelvic Evisceration
Current GROUPER logic for MS–DRGs 332, 333, and 334 (Rectal Resection with MCC, with CC and without CC/MCC, respectively) under MDC 6 (Diseases and Disorders of the Digestive System) and for MS–DRGs 734 and 735 (Pelvic Evisceration, Radical Hysterectomy and Radical Vulvectomy with CC/MCC and without CC/MCC, respectively) under MDC 13 (Diseases and Disorders of the Female Reproductive System) include a ‘‘cluster’’ of ICD–10–PCS procedure codes that describe pelvic evisceration.
A ‘‘cluster’’ is the term used to describe a circumstance when a combination of ICD–10–PCS procedure codes is needed to fully satisfy the equivalent meaning of an ICD–9–CM procedure code for it to be considered a plausible code translation.
Under ICD–10–PCS, users are instructed to code separately the organs or structures that are actually removed and for which there is a distinctly defined body part. Therefore, the case of a patient who undergoes a pelvic evisceration (exenteration) that involves the removal of the sigmoid colon and rectum would have each of those procedure sites (sigmoid colon and rectum) coded and reported separately (in addition to the procedure codes displayed in the cluster). In this scenario, if the principal diagnosis is a condition from the MDC 6 diagnosis list, the case would group to MS–DRGs 332, 333, and 334, regardless of the code cluster. In other words, it would not be necessary to retain the code cluster describing procedures performed on female pelvic organs in MDC 6.
Therefore, CMS proposed and finalized removing the procedure code cluster for pelvic evisceration procedures from MDC 6 under the ICD–10 MS–DRGs Version 34. The cluster would remain in ICD–10 MDC 13 under MS–DRGs 734 and 735 only.
MDC 19: Mental Diseases and Disorders
CMS finalized the proposal to the title of MS-DRG 884 (Organic Disturbances and Mental Retardation) to “MS-DRG 884 (Organic Disturbances and Intellectual Disability)” to reflect the current terminology to describe the condition.
MDC 23: Factors Influencing Health Status and Other Contacts with Health Services
Logic of MS-DRGs 945 and 946 (Rehabilitation with CC/MCC and without CC/MCC, respectively)
CMS received several requests to examine the Grouper logic for MS-DRGs 945 and 946. The requestors were concerned that ICD–9–CM codes that clearly identified an encounter for rehabilitation services such as procedure codes V57.89 (Care involving other specified rehabilitation procedure) and V57.9 (Care involving unspecified rehabilitation procedure) were not included in ICD–10–CM Version 33. In addition, the requestors pointed out that ICD–10–CM has significantly changed the guidelines for coding of admissions/encounters for rehabilitation.
In a Final Rule response CMS indicates that they “agree with the commenters that the issue of any updates to ICD–10–PCS guidelines should be considered along with any proposed MS–DRG updates because updated guidelines may impact code reporting. We welcome any suggestions on how to update the ICD–10–PCS guidelines. These suggestions should be sent to ICDProcedureCodeRequest@cms.hhs.gov. We plan to take any proposed ICD–10–PCS rehabilitation guideline updates to a future meeting of the ICD–10 Coordination and Maintenance Committee so that the public can provide input on any new rehabilitation guideline.”
As mentioned at the start, this article highlights MDC specific MS-DRG changes. This is a small dive into the coding changes found in the Final Rule. MMP, Inc. encourages you to review the Final Rule and to be on the lookout for our Annual Fall Inpatient Webinar focused on Coding Changes in October.
Beth Cobb
“I’m late! I’m late! For a very important date!”- The White Rabbit in the 1951 Disney Classic Alice in Wonderland
Much like the White Rabbit, CMS was a day late in the release of the Fiscal Year (FY) 2017 Inpatient Prospective Payment System (IPPS) Final Rule. Late or not, CMS noted in a related Fact Sheet that this rule finalizes policies that continue their commitment to increasingly shift Medicare payments from volume to value. This article focuses on final revisions made to the general acute care hospital Quality Programs.
HOSPITAL INPATIENT QUALITY REPORTING (IQR) PROGRAM
The Hospital IQR Program is a pay-for-reporting program established by the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act. General acute care hospitals successfully participating in this program and are also meaningful electronic health record (EHR) users will receive approximately 0.95 percent increase in their operating payment rates. The Final Rule finalized changes to this program for FY 2018 and FY 2019 payment determinations.
FY 2018 Program Year: Two Claims Based Measure Refinements
PN Payment: Hospital-Level, Risk-Standardized 30-Day Episode-of-Care Payment Measure for Pneumonia (NQF #2579)
This measure cohort will be expanded to include hospitalizations for patients with
- Principal discharge diagnosis of pneumonia, including not only viral or bacterial pneumonia, but also aspiration pneumonia; and
- Principal discharge diagnosis of sepsis (but not severe sepsis) with a secondary diagnosis of pneumonia (including viral or bacterial pneumonia and aspiration pneumonia) coded as present on admission (POA).
PSI 90: Patient Safety and Adverse Events Composite Measure (NQF #0531): The modified PSI 90 composite was adopted for the IQR Program. See table 3 for further detail.
FY 2019 Program Year: 15 Measures Removed & Four New Measures Added
CMS finalized the proposal to remove 15 measures for the FY 2019 payment determination and subsequent years (see Table 1).
Table 1: Measures Finalized for Removal for the FY 2019 Payment Determination and Subsequent Years
Four New Measures to be added to the Hospital IQR Program for the FY 2019 Payment Determination and Subsequent Years.
Table 2: New Measures Finalized for FY 2019 Payment Determination and Subsequent Years
CMS notes that the new “measures capture Medicare payment for services related to the episode procedure and take into account beneficiaries’ clinical complexity as well as geographic payment differences. We proposed these clinical episode-based measures to supplement the Hospital IQR Program’s Medicare Spending per Beneficiary (MSPB) Measure….the measures also support our mission to provide better healthcare for individuals, better health for populations, and lower costs for healthcare.”
In response to stakeholder concerns that these measures overlap with the Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) Measure, CMS notes “that unlike the overall MSPB measure, the clinical episode-based payment measures assess payment variation at the procedure level and only include services that are clinically related to the named episode procedure (for example, the spinal fusion measure includes inpatient admissions for “medical back problems” that occur following the initial spinal fusion procedure since the admission is likely a result of complications from the initial procedure).”
HOSPITAL VALUE BASED PURCHASING (VBP) PROGRAM
The Act instructs the Secretary to reduce the base operating DRG payment amount for a hospital for each discharge in a fiscal year by an applicable percent to fund this budget neutral program. CMS indicates in Table 16A of the Final Rule that the estimated amount available for value-based incentive payments to hospitals for FY 2017 is approximately $1.8 billion. Actual amounts will be displayed in Table 16B that is expected to be posted in October of this year.
FY 2019 Program Year: New Domain Name and Expansion of location for CAUTI and CLABSI
The Patient-and-Caregiver-Centered Experience of Care/Care Coordination Domain will become simply the Person and Community Engagement Domain.
The NHSN (National Health Safety Network) CAUTI (Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection) and CLABSI (Central Line-Associated Blood Stream Infections) outcome measures will include select ward (non-ICU) locations. “This expansion of the CAUTI and CLABSI measures aligns with the Hospital IQR Program. It also aligns with the HAC Reduction Program, which adopted the expansion of the CAUTI and CLABSI measures beginning with its FY 2018 program year (80 FR 49576 through 49578).”
FY 2021 Program Year: Two New Condition-Specific Payment Measures and Expansion of a 30-Day Mortality Measure Cohort
Two New Measures
Hospital-Level, Risk-Standardized Payment Associated with a 30-Day Episode-of-Care for Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) (NQF #2431), and
Hospital-Level, Risk-Standardized Payment Associated with a 30-Day Episode-of-Care for Heart Failure (HF) (NQF #2436).
Expansion of 30-Day-PN Mortality Cohort
Also for the FY 2021 Program Year, CMS finalized expansion of the cohort used for the 30-Day-PN Mortality measure to include patients with a principal discharge diagnosis of pneumonia, patients with a principal diagnosis of aspiration pneumonia and patients with a principal diagnosis of sepsis with a secondary diagnosis of pneumonia coded as present on admission (POA).
FY 2022 Program Year: CMS finalized the addition of Hospital 30-Day, All-Cause, Risk-Standardized Mortality Rate (RSMR) Following CABG Surgery (NQF #2554) (MORT-30-CABG) measure.
HOSPITAL ACQUIRED CONDITIONS (HAC) REDUCTION PROGRAM
This program creates an incentive for reducing the incidence of HACs by adjusting payments to hospitals in the worst performing quartile for HACs. CMS finalized the following five changes to the existing HAC Reduction Program policies:
- Clarified data requirements for Domain 1 (PSI-90),
- Established National Health Safety Network (NHSN) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Healthcare Associated Infection (HAI) data submission requirements for newly opened hospitals,
- Established performance periods for the FY 2018 and 2019 HAC Reduction Program,
- Adopted the refined Patient Safety Indicator (PSI) 90: Patient Safety for Selected Indicators Composite Measure (NQF #0531) beginning with the FY 2018 payment determination.
- Changed the Program scoring methodology from the current decile-based scoring to a continuous scoring methodology.
FY 2018 Program Year: Finalized Refinements to PSI 90
- First, the name of the PSI 90 measure will change to “Patient Safety and Adverse Events Composite: (NQF #0531).
- Second, the modified PSI 90 measure will include three new indicators (PSI-09, PSI-10 and PSI-11),
- Third, two Indicators will be re-specified in the modified PSI 90.
- PSI-12 Perioperative Pulmonary Embolism (PE) or Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) Rate no longer includes ECMO procedures in the denominator or isolated deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of the calf veins in the numerator.
- PSI 15 Accidental Puncture and Laceration Rate is now limited to discharges with an abdominal/pelvic operation, rather than including all medical and surgical discharges.
- Fourth, PSI-07 Central venous catheter-related blood stream infections rate will be removed in the modified PSI 90.
- Fifth, weighting of component indicators will be based not only on volume of each patient safety and adverse events, but also the harms associated with the events.
PSI 90: To Expand from 8 to 10 Indicators for FY 2018 Program
Table 3: PSI 90: Patient Safety and Adverse Events Composite (NQF #0531) for FY 2018
HOSPITAL READMISSIONS REDUCTION PROGRAM (HRRP)
This program requires a reduction to a hospital’s based operating DRG payment to account for excess readmissions associated with the applicable conditions. For FY 2017 and subsequent years, a hospital’s potential reduction will be based on a risk-adjusted readmission rate during a three-year period for the following six conditions:
- Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI),
- Heart Failure (HF),
- Pneumonia (PN),
- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD),
- Total Hip Arthroplasty/Total Knee Arthroplasty (THA/TKA), and
- New Condition for FY 2017 (pursuant to prior rulemaking): All-Cause, Unplanned Readmission Following Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) Surgery (inclusion of this condition was finalized in the FY 2015 IPPS/LTCH Final Rule).
CMS is updating the public reporting policy so that excess readmission rates will be posted to the Hospital Compare website as soon as feasible following the hospitals’ preview period.
More Than Half a Billion Dollars in Readmission Penalties for FY 2017
Set to begin October 1, 2016, Jordan Rau of Kaiser Health News (KHN)reports that readmission penalties are set to reach a new high of more than half a billion dollars in payments being withheld in the coming fiscal year. To see if and how much your hospital will be penalized you can get the data in KHN’s Article Medicare's Readmission Penalties Hit New High.
Resources
CMS Fact Sheet Announcing release of 2017 IPPS Final Rule: https://www.cms.gov/Newsroom/MediaReleaseDatabase/Fact-sheets/2016-Fact-sheets-items/2016-08-02.html
2017 IPPS Final Rule (Display copy): https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-Payment/AcuteInpatientPPS/FY2017-IPPS-Final-Rule-Home-Page-Items/FY2017-IPPS-Final-Rule-Regulations.html?DLPage=1&DLEntries=10&DLSort=0&DLSortDir=ascending
Beth Cobb
Growing up in the south, I remember being told that summer is mosquito season. What I found in writing this article is that it’s more about the temperature levels. Specifically, when temperatures reach a consistent 50°F mosquito eggs begin hatching and mosquito season begins. So, in more temperate parts of the nation, mosquitoes can be present year-round. Here in my home state of Alabama the mosquito season typically begins in early March.
I also learned that there are over 3,000 different species of mosquitoes throughout the world; currently 176 of these species has been recognized in the United States. Today, we are focusing on just one group of mosquito, Aedes mosquitoes that can transmit the Zika virus.
About the Virus
The Zika Virus was first discovered in 1947 in the Zika Forest of Uganda. The first human cases of the virus were detected in 1952 and since outbreaks have been reported in tropical Africa, Southeast Asia, and the Pacific Islands. The disease is transmitted by Aedes mosquitoes who also transmit three other vector-borne diseases (dengue, chikungunya and yellow fever).
The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) indicates that most infected people are asymptomatic. When a person is symptomatic, common symptoms of the virus normally lasts for 2-7 days and can include:
- Acute onset of fever,
- Maculopapular rash,
- Headache,
- Muscle and joint pain, and
- Conjunctivitis.
The World Health Organization (WHO) notes two serious complications reported by Brazil:
- July 2015: Brazil reported an association between the virus and Guillain-Barre syndrome.
- October 2015: Brazil reported an association between the virus infection and microcephaly.
On February 1, 2016 the WHO declared the Zika virus a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) and since then has been posting weekly Zika Situation Reports. The last report posted at the time of this article was June 23, 2016. Key notes of concern from the June 23rd Summary includes:
- As of June 22, 2016, 61 countries and territories report continuing mosquito-borne transmissions of which:
- 47 countries are experiencing a first outbreak of the virus since 2015 with ongoing transmissions by mosquitoes.
- Ten countries have reported evidence of person-to-person transmission of the virus noted to probably be via a sexual route.
- As of June 22, 2016, microcephaly and other central nervous system (CNS) malformations potentially associated with the virus or suggestive of congenital infection have been reported by twelve countries or territories.
- As of June 9th, the CDC has reported three live born infants with birth defects and three pregnancy losses with birth defects with laboratory evidence of possible Zika virus infection.
- 13 Countries and territories worldwide have reported an increase incidence of Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS) and/or laboratory confirmation of a Zika virus infection among GBS cases.
Medicare to Cover Diagnostic Testing for Zika Virus
CMS has released MLN Matters Article SE1615 titled Medicare Coverage of Diagnostic Testing for Zika Virus. Specific Provider Action Needed includes:
- Informing the public that Medicare covers testing under Medicare Part B “as long as the clinical diagnostic laboratory test is reasonable and necessary for the diagnosis or treatment of a person’s illness or injury,”
- As currently there are no HCPCS codes for testing of the Zika virus, laboratories furnishing the Zika tests should contact their Medicare Administrative Contractors (MACs) for guidance on appropriate billing codes to use on the claims; and
- Labs should provide “resources and cost information as may be requested by the MACs in order for the MACs to establish appropriate payment amounts for the tests.”
ICD-10-CM Coding for Zika
The Zika Virus was discussed during the March 9-10, 2016 ICD-10 Coordination and Maintenance Committee Meeting. ICD-10-CM currently classifies the virus to code A92.8, Other specific mosquito-borne virus.
In December 2015 the WHO noted the need for a separate code for the Zika Virus to allow for tracking of cases. The WHO proposed a new code for the Zika virus (A92.5). To be consistent with the planned WHO ICD-10 update, effective October 1, 2016 ICD-10-CM will include the addition of the following:
Chapter 1 – Certain Infectious and Parasitic Diseases (A00-B99)
A92 – Other Mosquito-borne viral fevers
New Code: A92.5 – Zika virus disease
Zika virus fever
Zika virus infection
Zika, NOS
Prevention
The American Mosquito Control Association (AMCA) is an association “dedicated to providing leadership, information and education leading to the enhancement of public health and quality of life through the suppression of mosquitoes.” In fact, this past week of June 26 – July 2nd was National Mosquito Control Awareness Week 2016. In a Press Release template, the AMCA® reminds the public to practice the THREE D's of Mosquito Prevention and Protection:
- Drain: Empty out water containers at least once per week
- Dress: Wear long sleeves, long pants, and light-colored, loose-fitting clothing, and
- Defend: Properly apply an approved repellant such as DEET, picaridin, IR3535 or oil of lemon-eucalyptus.
Beth Cobb
National Medicare (CMS) and their local Administrative Contractors (MACs) are responsible for a variety of different tasks – processing and paying claims, educating providers, ensuring payments are appropriate, and verifying that providers are following the Medicare regulations. It’s a big job but, lucky for them, they have help, especially in the area of oversight. There are the Recovery Auditors, the Quality Improvement Organizations (QIOs), Supplemental Medical Review Contractors (SMRCs), Comprehensive Error Rate Testing (CERT) auditors, and the Office of Inspector General (OIG). A recent OIG audit concerning mechanical ventilation found billing errors so the OIG offered a number of recommendations to CMS on how to make things better.
The OIG conducted a review to determine whether Medicare payments to hospitals for inpatient claims with certain MS-DRGs that required 96 or more consecutive hours of mechanical ventilation complied with Medicare requirements. MS-DRG 207 (respiratory system diagnosis) and MS-DRG 870 (septicemia or severe sepsis) both require that the patient has received 96 hours or more continuous mechanical ventilation, indicated on the claim with procedure code 96.72. These MS-DRGs pay a higher reimbursement rate than the corresponding MS-DRG assignments for a patient who did not receive 96 hours or more of ventilation.
Due to findings from previous OIG audits and the known risk of overpayments associated with mechanical ventilation, CMS has already taken actions to reduce the number of payment errors. They have claims processing edits based on the inpatient admission length of stay and also have provided education concerning the requirements for coding mechanical ventilation of 96 hours or more. One such education offering is the October 2011 Medicare Quarterly Compliance Newsletter.
In the current review, the OIG identified overpayments of $1.5 million for the specific claims reviewed. The OIG estimates overpayments of over $19.5 million for MS-DRGs 207 and 870 for the two-year audit period. Based on this finding, they determined current controls were inadequate to prevent incorrect billing and recommended additional actions by CMS to reduce payment errors. Specifically the current billing edit is based on total length of stay – the OIG recommends the edit be modified to look at the date mechanical ventilation begins and the discharge date to ensure there is sufficient time for 96 or more hours of mechanical ventilations. CMS concurred with the recommendation and replied, “Effective October 1, 2016, CMS will implement an edit to ensure correct coding of mechanical ventilation greater than 96 consecutive hours by using the mechanical ventilation procedure service date as the start date to calculate consecutive days.” CMS published official guidance for this in Transmittal 3504 from April 2016. To fulfill other recommendations from the audit Medicare will also be recouping the identified overpayments, expanding their own reviews, and providing additional education.
Hospitals need to be sure their coders understand the correct assignment of the procedure code for mechanical ventilation. Coders also need to be aware of the change in procedure code description from ICD-9 to ICD-10. The I-10 description for 5A1955Z is Respiratory ventilation, greater than 96 consecutive hours, which differs from the I-9 procedure code 96.72 description of 96 consecutive hours or more. The “greater than” description equates to a patient being on continuous mechanical ventilation for at least five (5) days, one day longer than the minimum 4 days of “96 hours or more.” This means Medicare’s new edit for October 2016 will look for less than 5 days from the date of initiation of mechanical ventilation until discharge.
Hospitals may want to consider some internal education and/or audits of claims assigned this procedure code. In other words, hospitals may want to “oversight” themselves, before oversight by Medicare or the overseers of Medicare oversight.
Debbie Rubio
Dilemma:
How do you code COPD with Acute Exacerbation of Asthmatic Bronchitis?
Solution:
Two codes are necessary to capture the full diagnosis, one code for the Acute Exacerbation of COPD (J44.1) plus a second code to identify the type of Asthma (J45.901).
Per ICD-10-CM, coders are instructed as follows:
Bronchitis (diffuse) (fibrinous) (hypostatic) (infective) (membranous) (J40)
Asthmatic (J45.9)
Chronic (J44.9)
with
Acute lower respiratory infection (J44.0)
Exacerbation (acute) (J44.1)
OR
Asthma, asthmatic (bronchial) (catarrh) (spasmodic) (J45.909)
with
Chronic Obstructive Bronchitis (J44.9)
with
Acute Lower Respiratory Infection (J44.0)
Exacerbation (acute) (J44.1)
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (J44.9)
with
Acute Lower Respiratory Infection (J44.0)
Exacerbation (acute) (J44.1)
Under category (J44) (Other Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease) there is a Code also note instructing coders to code the type of Asthma, if applicable (J45.-). In this case, Unspecified Asthma with Acute Exacerbation (J45.901) is added.
Two things to remember:
- Since an Acute Exacerbation is a worsening of a Chronic Condition, we automatically know that the Asthmatic Bronchitis is a Chronic condition.
- The diagnosis of Acute Asthmatic Bronchitis is not the same as Acute Bronchitis.
If an MD documents Acute Bronchitis and then further specifies it as Acute Asthmatic Bronchitis, a code for Acute Bronchitis (J44.0) is not coded in addition. In this case, the patient does not have Acute Bronchitis, only Acute Asthmatic Bronchitis.
If the documentation is unclear as to whether a patient has Acute Bronchitis and an Acute Exacerbation of Asthmatic Bronchitis or just an Acute Exacerbation of Asthmatic Bronchitis, query the physician for clarification. Work with your physicians to help them understand the different descriptions and options in ICD-10-CM.
Information Source(s):
- ICD-10-CM Official Coding Guidelines
- ICD-10-CM and ICD-10-PCS Coding Handbook, Chapter 19 – Diseases of the Respiratory System, written by Nelly Leon-Chisen, RHIA, American Hospital Association
- TruCode encoder
- ICD-10-CM Expert for Hospitals, by Optum
Susie James
Dilemma:
A patient is diagnosed with Atherosclerosis of the Left Superficial Femoral Artery with Total Occlusion and a Non-healing Ulcer of the Left Lower Extremity. The patient also has a history of Polyneuropathy and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. What are the diagnosis codes for this scenario?
Solution:
The diagnoses for this patient include Atherosclerosis of Native Arteries of Left Leg with Ulceration of Other Part of Lower Left Leg (I70.248), Chronic Total Occlusion of Artery of the Extremities (I70.92) (cc), Type 2 Diabetes with Other Skin Ulcer (E11.622), Non-pressure Chronic Ulcer of Other Part of Left Lower Leg with Unspecified Severity (L97.829) (cc) and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Diabetic Polyneuropathy (E11.42). The principal diagnosis depends on the circumstances of the admission.
Please note: ICD-10 assumes a cause-and-effect relationship between the Diabetes, the Leg Ulcer and the Polyneuropathy. This is a change from ICD-9-CM.
Information Source(s):
- Coding Clinic, First Quarter, 2016, pages 11 and 12
Effective with discharges March 18, 2016 - ICD-10-CM Alphabetic Index
- ICD-10 Coding Handbook
Yes! Help me improve my Medicare FFS business.
Please, no soliciting.