Knowledge Base Category -

Did You Know?

It has been over eight years since new discharge status codes (81 through 95) were finalized in the 2014 IPPS Final Rule (link).

The new codes were added to the GROUPER logic for MS-DRGs 280, 281, and 282 to identify those patients diagnosed with an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) who were discharged/transferred to another facility with a planned acute care hospital inpatient readmission alive. Following are pertinent comments from the 2014 final rule regarding these codes:

“The new discharge status codes related to a planned acute care hospital inpatient readmission were developed and approved by the National Uniform Billing Committee (NUBC) in response to a request by the provider community. The purpose of the new codes is to allow providers to track these types of situations when they occur. According to meeting notes from the NUBC, there is not a designated timeframe (or limitation) in reporting these new codes.”

“The planned readmission discharge status codes can also be reported for other MS-DRGs.”

“These new discharge status codes are not related in any way to the Hospital Readmission Reduction Program and will not be taken into account in the readmission measures for that program.”

You will find the discussion about the new codes on pages 50533 and 50534 of the 2014 IPPS Final Rule.

With these codes having been in place since October 1, 2013, I wanted to know if hospitals are using them? To find the answer, I turned to our sister company, RealTime Medicare Data (RTMD). Here is what the data revealed:

• In FY 2021, in the RTMD database, there were 7,898,214 Medicare Fee-for-Service acute inpatient hospital paid claims.
• Of those claims, 12,146 included one of the discharge status codes that includes a planned readmission.
• The top five discharge status codes with a planned readmission by volume were:
• 2,307 claims included discharge status code 81 (Discharged to home or self-care with a planned acute care hospital inpatient readmission),
• 2,185 claims included discharge status code 83 (Discharged/transferred to a skilled nursing facility (SNF) with Medicare certification with a planned acute care hospital inpatient readmission,
• 1,873 claims included discharge status code 90 (Discharged/transferred to an inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) including rehabilitation distinct part units of a hospital with a planned acute care hospital inpatient readmission,
• 1,602 claims included discharge status code 86 (Discharged/transferred to home under care of organized home health service organization with a planned acute care hospital inpatient readmission), and
• 1,437 claims included discharge status code 82 (Discharged/transferred to a short-term general hospital with a planned acute care hospital inpatient readmission.
• Top five states using discharge status codes with a planned readmission:
• Florida – 1,281 claims
• Texas – 1,140 claims
• Pennsylvania – 918 claims
• New York - 884 claims
• California – 760 claims
• Bottom five states using discharge status codes with a planned readmission:
• Arkansas – 13 claims
• Ohio – 7 claims
• Vermont – 5 claims
• Hawaii – 3 claims
• Hawaii – 3 claims

Why It Matters?

Assigning the correct discharge status code is important and can be costly if not correct.

The Comprehensive Error Rate Testing (CERT) A/B Medicare Administrative Contractor (MAC) Outreach & Education Task Force has published an education resource titled Patient Discharge Status Codes Matter (link). In this document, the CERT contractor notes they have issued errors related to the incorrect use of Discharge Status Codes that may result in an overpayment or underpayment of Medicare claims.

Incorrect discharge status codes can also cause an admitting facility to not be able to be paid due to the incorrect billing of the acute inpatient hospital.

What Can You Do?

A patient’s discharge disposition can change after the patient has already discharged from your hospital. The CERT contractor encourages hospitals “to follow-up with the patient after discharge and prior to submitting the claim to Medicare to ensure the patient went to the planned facility that was recorded in the medical record. This will prevent incorrect billing of the Discharge Status Code and avoid unnecessary adjustments to claims when the incorrect code is used.”

I encourage you to read the CERT Task Force document as well as the listed resources on this document to help prevent improper payments due to incorrect billing of discharge status codes.

Additional Resource:

A related article in this week’s newsletter (link), provides detail from the 2021 Comprehensive Error Rate Testing (CERT) program annual report and annual supplement data to the report. This article provides key facts about the CERT.

About the CERT

• The objective of the CERT program is to monitor and report the accuracy of claims payment in the Medicare Fee-for-Service program.
• CMS uses the CERT error rate to evaluate the performance of the Medicare Administrative Contractors (MACs).
• There are two CERT contractors:
• The CERT Review Contractor (CERT RC), and
• CERT Statistical Contractor (CERT SC).
• The CERT claim selection includes a stratified random sample of approximately 50,000 claims that are chosen by claim type (Part A, Part B and Durable Medical Equipment, Prosthetics, Orthotics, and Supplies (DMEPOS), and includes paid and denied claims by the MAC.
• The CERT process is a federally mandated program and not responding to documentation requests will result in a denial of all services billed on the claim.
• CERT request letters are mailed to the correspondence address listed in the Provider Enrollment, Change and Ownership System (PECOS).
• You can submit requested documentation to the CERT via postal mail, fax, Electronic Submissions of Medical Documentation (esMD), via CD or via email attachment(s).
• For short (less than 24 – 48 hours stay) inpatient hospital stay, a discharge summary is not required when a beneficiary is seen for minor problems or interventions, as defined by the medical staff. In this instance, a final progress note may be substituted for the discharge summary.
• The billing provider is responsible for obtaining medical records from the third-party to substantiate the claim that was billed.
• The CERT makes every effort to obtain the request documentation. Providers have 45 days to respond to the first letter requesting documentation. When the CERT does not receive the requested documentation by the 75th day, a claim is counted as a non-response error and is subject to overpayment recovery by the MAC.
• Claims reviews by the CERT includes program checks for compliance with Medicare statutes and regulations, billing instructions, National Coverage Determinations (NDCs), Local Coverage Determinations (LCDs), Local Coverage Articles (LCAs), and provision in the CMS instructional manuals.
• Denied claims as well as overpayments and underpayments are all considered to be an improper payment by the CERT program.
• Improper payments are attributed to one of five major error categories (no documentation, insufficient documentation, medical necessity, incorrect coding, or other).
• The improper payment rate is not a “fraud rate,” but a measurement of payments that did not meet Medicare requirements.
• Providers that wish to appeal a CERT contractor’s determination can follow the normal redetermination process to appeal all CERT denials.
• The CERT A/B MAC Outreach & Education Task Force has a goal to ensure consistent communication and education to reduce the Medicare Part A and Part B error rates. The Task Force webpage (link) includes education resources for providers.

Resources:

Fiscal Year 2021 Estimated Improper Payment Rates

In mid-November 2021, the Comprehensive Error Rate Testing (CERT) program published the Fiscal Year (FY) 2021 Annual CERT Report. A related Press Release, (link) noted that “CMS’ aggressive corrective actions led to an estimated $20.72 billion in reduction of Medicare Fee-for-Service (FFS) improper payments over seven years.”

While CMS cites an impressive reduction in improper payments over seven years, there was only a slight change from 2020 to 2021.

• Improper Payment Rate
• o FY 2020: 6.27%
• o FY 2021: 6.26%
• Improper Payment Amount
• o FY 2020: $25.74 billion
• o FY 2021: $25.03 billion

As I have noted in past articles, CMS noted in the Press Release that “while fraud and abuse may lead to improper payments, it is important to note that the vast majority of improper payments do not constitute fraud, and improper payment estimates are not fraud rate estimates.”

Fiscal Year 2021 Supplemental Improper Payment Data

The 2021 Supplemental Improper Payment Data Report (link) was published on December 12, 2021. This report highlights common causes of improper payments and includes tables allowing you to drill down into the review findings.

COVID-19 Impact

• From March 27, 2020, until August 10, 2020, CERT program activities were suspended,
• CMS reduced the claim sample size for FY 2021 (claims submitted July 1, 2019, through June 30, 2020), and
• Claims with dates of service within the COVID-19 PHE were reviewed in accordance with all applicable CMS waivers and flexibilities.

“0 or 1 day” Length of Stay Claims

Since implementation of the Two-Midnight Rule, the supplemental data report has included a table comparing improper payments rates for Part A hospital claims by length of stay (LOS). The improper payment rate for “0 or 1 Day” stay claims was highest in 2014 at 37.18% and in 2021 hit an all-time low of 16.8%. However, with the project improper payment rate being $1.5 billion, it is not surprising that Two-Midnight Stays are currently on the OIG Work Plan (link) and Livanta as the National Medicare Claim Review Contractor (link), is focusing their review efforts solely on Short Stay Reviews (SSRs) and Higher Weighted DRG (HWDRG) reviews.

Top 20 Service Types with Highest Improper Payments: Part A Hospital IPPS Table D4 of this report includes the top 20 DRG types with the highest improper payment rate. The table also details the percentage of error by each of the CERT’s major error categories:

• No documentation,
• Insufficient documentation,
• Medical Necessity,
• Incorrect Coding, and
• Other.

Overall, 58.9% of the errors in this table were due to the error category medical necessity. The CERT places a claim into this category when the CERT contractor reviewers receive adequate documentation from the medical records submitted to make an informed decision that the services billed were not medically necessary based upon Medicare coverage and payment policies. One hundred percent of the errors for the following four DRG Types was attributed to medical necessity:

• DRG 069: Transient Ischemia,
• DRGs 308, 309, 310: Cardiac Arrhythmia & Conduction Disorders,
• DRG 312: Syncope, and
• DRG 313: Chest Pain.

Moving Forward

For the Septicemia DRGs 871 and 872, 37.2% of the errors was attributed to “no documentation.” Unfortunately, denied claims due to no documentation is also a frequent issue reported by the Medicare Administrative Contractors (MACs) and the Supplemental Medical Review Contractor (SMRC).

Moving forward, here are ideas and resources to help in your efforts to prevent claims errors:

• Visit the CERT Provider Website (link) to find information about the CERT, how to submit records, sample request letters and much more.
• Become familiar with National and Local Coverage Determinations and Local Coverage Articles that detail indications and limitations of specific services. For example, DRGs 469 and 470 (Major Hip and Knee Joint Replacement or Reattachment of Lower Extremity) had the highest projected improper payment in Table D4 at $724,055,597. The CERT attributed 19.5% of the error to insufficient documentation and 80.3% to medical necessity. CMS has published an MLN Booklet titled Major Joint Replacement (Hip or Knee) (link) that provides guidance on what to document to avoid denied claims.
• Become familiar with and utilize your hospital’s Program for Evaluating Payment Patterns Electronic Report (PEPPER).
• And finally, take the time to review the CERT’s Supplemental Improper Payment Data report annually.

Did You Know?

January is Thyroid Awareness Month.

Why Should You Care?

As a health care consumer, it is important to understand what the thyroid gland does, what thyroid hormone impacts and what can happen when your thyroid gland is not functioning properly. According to the CDC (link)

• The thyroid gland, located in the front of the neck just below the Adam’s apple, takes iodine from your diet and makes thyroid hormone. Thyroid hormone affects your physical energy, temperature, weight, and mood.
• In general, there are two broad groups of thyroid disorders: abnormal function and abnormal growth (nodules) in the gland.
• Thyroid disorders are common, especially in older people and women. Most thyroid problems can be detected and treated.
• Abnormal function is usually related to the gland producing too little thyroid hormone (hypothyroidism) or too much thyroid hormone (hyperthyroidism).
• Benign nodules in the thyroid are common, usually do not cause serious health problems, can occasionally put pressure on the neck and cause trouble with swallowing, breathing, or speaking if too large.
• Thyroid cancers are much less common than benign nodules and with treatment, the cure rate for thyroid cancer is more than 90 percent. You can learn more about Thyroid Cancer and the annual Medicare Treatment costs of Thyroid Cancer in a related RealTime Medicare Data (RTMD) infographic in this week’s newsletter.

As a health care provider, it is important to be aware that MS-DRGs 625, 626, and 627 (Thyroid, Parathyroid & Thyroglossal Procedures with MCC, with CC, without CC/MCC respectively), have been under scrutiny by the Comprehensive Error Rate Testing (CERT) and Supplemental Medicare Review Contractor (SMRC).

The 2018 CERT Medicare Fee-for-Service Improper Payment Rate Report noted an improper payment rate of 49.1% for this DRG group. Subsequently, in February 2020, CMS tasked Noridian, as the SMRC, to perform data analysis and DRG validation reviews of the same DRG group. Noridian published their review results in October 2021 (link) citing a 12% error rate.

What Can You Do?

As a healthcare consumer:

• Have your doctor check for thyroid disease during a standard physical exam by palpation of the thyroid gland.
• There are two standard blood tests that your doctor may recommend. One measures your thyroid hormone level (T4) and another measures thyrotropin (TSH) which is hormone secreted from the pituitary gland that controls how much thyroid hormone your thyroid makes.

Treatment for thyroid disease will be specific to the type and severity of the thyroid disorder and the age and overall health of the patient.

As a healthcare provider, one of the reasons cited by the SMRC for errors was providers not responding to requests for documentation within 45 calendar days of the additional documentation request (ADR). Noridian has a Documentation Requests webpage (link) which includes a link to an example ADR letter which provides guidance on how you can submit medical records.

Over the past thirteen years, part of my job has been to review medical records. When thinking about Social Determinants of Health (SDOHs), I distinctly remember one project where I reviewed three separate admissions for the same patient. Digging into the charts, I noted the patient’s discharge status was consistently to “tent city.” Unfortunately, tent cities are not a phenomenon limited to the Southeastern United States. Also unfortunately, this is a perfect example of a SDOH that can negatively impact an individual’s health outcomes.

Did You Know?

Social Determinants of Health (SDOHs) and Z Codes

Z codes first became available with the implementation of ICD-10-CM codes on October 1, 2015. Z code categories Z55 – Z65 are related to SDOHs. Eleven new codes became effective on October 1, 2021, bringing the list to a total of 109 codes.

New FY 2022 SDOH Z codes

• Z55.5 – Less than a high school diploma,
• Z58.6 – Inadequate drinking-water supply,
• Z59.00 – Homelessness unspecified,
• Z59.01 – Sheltered homelessness,
• Z59.02 – Unsheltered homelessness,
• Z59.41 – Food insecurity,
• Z59.48 – Other specified lack of food,
• Z59.811 – Housing instability, housed, with risk of homelessness,
• Z59.812 – Housing instability, housed, homelessness in past 12 months,
• Z59.819 – Housing instability, housed unspecified, and
• Z59.89 – Other problems related to housing and economic circumstances.

In January 2020, the CMS published an initial Data Highlight focused on the utilization of Z codes among Medicare Fee-for-Service Beneficiaries in 2017 (link). The authors suggested that “reducing reliance on clinicians to capture SDOH, improving provider and medical coder education, and filling gaps in codes, among other policy-based interventions, would likely improve the reporting of SDOH coding across care settings.”

In September 2021, the CMS published a follow-up Data Highlight titled, Utilization of Z Codes for Social Determinants of Health among Medicare Fee-for-Service Beneficiaries, 2019 (link).

September 2021 Data Highlight Key Findings

Barriers to increasing documentation of Z codes

• Z code claims are not generally used for payment purposes,
• There are a limited number of Z codes and sub-codes meaning some social, economic, and environmental determinants may not be captured,
• While there are providers who may have had training regarding SDOH and recognize challenges some of their patient’s face, “they may feel limited in what they can do and/or may require guidance on how best to assist patients in addressing their non-medical needs.”

Data Highlight Authors Conclusions

• “More widely adopted and consistent documentation of them is needed to comprehensively identify non-medical factors affecting health and to track progress toward addressing them; doing so could aid in work toward achieving health equity and ensuring highest quality and best-value care for all beneficiaries.”
• “It will be critically important to carefully analyze data from 2020 and 2021 to understand whether and to what extent the public health emergency (PHE) may have had an impact on social, economic, and environmental determinants, and/or the rate of documentation of those determinants via Z codes.”
• “All members of the US health system: payers, patient-centered medical homes, hospitals, national organizations, governments at the local, State, and Federal level, communities, providers, patients, as well as other stakeholders all have an important role to play in identifying social, economic, and environmental determinants, and ultimately improving health outcomes.”

RealTime Medicare Data CY 2020 Z Code Analytics

Analysis of CY 2020 Medicare Fee-for-Service paid claims data provided by our sister company, RealTime Medicare Data (RTMD), reinforced the current underuse of SDOH Z codes. For instance,

• Less than 1% of claims include a SDOH Z code for the Inpatient Hospitals, Outpatient Hospital and Part B places of service,
• Ninety-four percent of the claims were Hospital Outpatient claims, and
• Z59.0 (Homelessness) was the top Z code used in all three places of service.

MMP has compiled a high-level summary of the data analysis that can be downloaded here (link).

Using Z codes to Advance Health Equity

The American Hospital Association has been advocating for utilization of SDOH Z codes and publishing education for Providers since 2015 and have recently updated their ICD-10-CM Coding for Social Determinants of Health Fact Sheet (link).

In the January 13, 2022 edition of MLN Connects (link), the CMS promotes awareness of January being National Poverty in America Awareness Month noting that “37.2 million Americans living in poverty have an increased risk of chronic conditions, lower life expectancy, and barriers to quality health care; and racial and ethnic minorities have poverty rates more than twice that of white Americans. The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly affected these populations and low-income families.”

CMS is also promoting the use of Z codes to help advance health equity for all Americans by identifying poverty, unemployment, homelessness, and other social determinants.

Moving Forward

Ensure that key stakeholders in your facility (i.e., Physicians, Nurses, Social Workers, Case Managers, CDI Specialists, Registered Dieticians) receive education about SDOH and coding ICD-10-CM Z codes. A good place to start is with the guidance found in the ICD-10-CM Official Guidelines for Coding and Report FY 2022 (link). Additional resources available for your education efforts includes:

• CMS’ Using Z Codes infographic: (link)
• Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion – SDOH webpage: (link)
• CDC’s SDOH webpage: (link)
• AHA’s SDOH webpage: (link)

In response to the ongoing COVID-10 public health emergency, CDC’s National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) will be implementing new ICD-10 diagnosis and procedures codes. The three new ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes are for reporting an individual’s vaccination status.

New Diagnosis Codes

• Z28.310: Unvaccinated for COVID-19
• Z28.311: Partially vaccinated for COVID-19
• Z28.39: Other underimmunization status

There are also seven new ICD-10-PCS procedure codes to describe the introduction or infusion or therapeutics, including vaccines for COVID-19 treatment. In the CMS announcement related to the procedure codes, providers are reminded that “for hospitalized patients, Medicare pays for the COVID-19 vaccines and their administration separately from the Diagnosis-Related Group rate. As such, Medicare expects that the appropriate CPT codes will be used when a Medicare beneficiary is administered a vaccine while a hospital patient.”

New Procedure Codes

• XW013V7: Introduction of COVID-19 vaccine dose 3 into subcutaneous tissue, percutaneous approach, new technology group 7
• XW013W7: Introduction of COVID-19 vaccine booster into subcutaneous tissue, percutaneous approach, new technology group 7
• XW023V7: Introduction of COVID-19 Vaccine dose 3 into muscle, percutaneous approach, new technology group 7,
• XW023W7: Introduction of COVID-19 Vaccine booster into muscle, percutaneous approach, new technology group 7,
• XW0DXR7: Introduction of fostamatinib into mouth and pharynx, external approach, new technology group 7,
• XW0G7R7: Introduction of fostamatinib into upper GI, via natural or artificial opening, new technology group 7, and
• XW0H7R7: Introduction of fostamatinib into lower GI, via natural or artificial opening, new technology group 7.

All ten new codes will become effective April 1, 2022.

Resource: CMS’ MS-DRG Classifications and Software webpage (link), see ICD-10 MS-DRGs V39.1 Effective April 1, 2022 Zip file under “Latest News”

Did You Know?

In response to the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency, the CMS has published several Interim Final Rules with comment period (IFC). Included in the April 6, 2020 IFC, (https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2020-04-06/pdf/2020-06990.pdf), with respect to pulmonary rehabilitation, cardiac rehabilitation, and intensive cardiac rehabilitation services, CMS adopted a change, “to specify that direct supervision for these services includes virtual presence through audio/video real-time communications technology when use of such technology is indicated to reduce exposure risks for the beneficiary or health care provider.”

The CY 2021 OPPS Final Rule finalized maintaining this policy change being until the end of the PHE or December 31, 2021, whichever is later. The PHE was renewed on October 15, 2021, meaning this change will remain in place at least through January 13, 2022.

CMS again references this policy change in the CY 2022 OPPS Final Rule (https://public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2021-24011.pdf), noting, “the required direct physician supervision can be provided through virtual presence using audio/video real-time communications technology (excluding audio-only) subject to the clinical judgment of the supervising practitioner.”

Why This Matters?

With the recent release of the CY 2022 OPPS/ASC final rule, MMP has had clients ask if CMS will make this option for audio/video real-time physician supervision for these rehabilitation services permanent. Specific to this question, I have listed a few comments by the CMS in the CY 2022 OPPS/ASC final rule:

• Commentors are in favor of adoption of direct supervision via two-way, audio/video communication technology on a permanent basis, or if the decision is made to end this flexibility, they encourage CMS to maintain this policy for a period following the COIVD-19 PHE, such as the end of 2022.
• Most commentors were in favor of developing a service-level modifier to allow CMS to track and collect data.
• Based on public comments, and feedback since the policy was implemented, CMS is convinced “that we need more information on the issues involved with direct supervision through virtual presence before implementing this policy permanently.”

Whether or not this policy becomes permanent, facilities providing cardiac rehabilitation services need to be aware of and compliant with coverage requirements for a couple of reasons. First, this continues to be an area of focus for Medicare review contractors. Second, given that according to the CDC ( https://www.cdc.gov/heartdisease/facts.htm), heart disease costs the United States about $363 billion each year from 2016 to 2017, cardiac rehabilitation is big business. You can read more about how cardiac rehabilitation can help heal your heart on the CDC website (https://www.cdc.gov/heartdisease/cardiac_rehabilitation.htm).

So, just how big of a business is cardiac rehabilitation? To answer this question, I turned to RealTime Medicare Data (RTMD). Specifically, volume and paid claims data below represent Medicare Fee-for-Service outpatient hospital claims in the entire RTMD footprint for calendar years 2019 and 2020 for cardiac rehabilitation CPT codes 93798 (outpatient cardiac rehab with continuous ECG monitoring) and 93979 (outpatient cardiac rehab without continuous ECG monitoring).

CY 2019 Top 5 States by Procedure Volume

• Florida (292,461)
• Texas (287,575)
• California (229,235)
• Illinois (186,899), and
• Pennsylvania (164,897)

CY 2020 Top 5 States by Procedure Volume

• Florida (182,865),
• Texas (180,179),
• California (131,190),
• Illinois (120,897), and
• Pennsylvania (105,882)

Even though the COVID-19 PHE had an impact on procedure volume and sum of paid claims, collectively across the country, Medicare payment for cardiac rehabilitation is big business.

What Can You Do?

• Be aware of documentation needed to support medical necessity of the services provided,
• Submit medical record requests to the Medicare Contractor in a timely manner, and
• Read a related article in this week’s newsletter to learn who is currently targeting Cardiac Rehabilitation and what coverage documents and education resources are available by CMS and Medicare Contractors.

The CMS released the Calendar Year (CY) 2022 Outpatient Prospective Payment System (OPPS) and Ambulatory Surgical Center (ASC) Payment System Final Rule on November 2, 2021. In a related Fact Sheet (link), they note that this Final Rule “includes policies that align with several key goals of the Administration, including addressing the health equity gap, fighting the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency (PHE), encouraging transparency in the health system, and promoting safe, effective, and patient-centered care.”

CMS estimates “that the OPPS expenditures, including beneficiary cost-sharing, for CY 2022 would be approximately $82.1 billion, which is approximately $5.9 billion higher than estimated OPPS expenditures in CY 2021.”

Changes to the Ambulatory Surgical Center (ASC) Covered Procedure List (CPL)

In the CY 2022 OPPS Proposed Rule, CMS also did an about face for the ASC CPL. Of the 267 procedures added to the list in CY 2021, CMS proposed to remove 258 procedures as they do not believe they meet the proposed revisions to the CY 2022 ASC CPL criteria.

CMS noted in the Proposed Rule, “Based on our internal review of preliminary claims submitted to Medicare, we do not believe that ASCs have been furnishing the majority of the 267 procedures finalized in 2021. Because of this, we believe it is unlikely that ASCs have made practice changes in reliance on the policy we adopted in CY 2021. Therefore, we do not anticipate that ASCs would be significantly affected by the removal of these 258 procedures from the ASC CPL.”

After reviewing recommendations made by commentors, CMS finalized the removal of 255 of the 258 codes proposed from the ASC CPL. Table 62 in the Final Rule includes the complete list of 255 procedures.

Revisions to the CY 2022 ASC CPL Criteria

In CY 2021, CMS revised their policy for adding surgical procedures to the ASC CPL. For CY 2022, they have finalized their proposal to revise the requirements for covered surgical procedures to reinstate the general standards and exclusion criteria established prior to CY 2021.

Inpatient, outpatient or ASC, documentation is crucial to accurately reflect the complexity of the patient, support the medical necessity for services provided and support the setting in which services are performed.

Hospital Price Transparency Increase in Civil Monetary Penalties

CMS noted in the Proposed Rule from initial months of experience with enforcing the hospital price transparency requirements that they expressed “concern by what appears to be a trend towards a high rate of hospital noncompliance identified by CMS through sampling and reviews to date.” One approach to address this trend was their proposal to impose potentially higher penalties and “to scale the CMP to ensure the penalty amount would be more relevant to the characteristics of the noncompliant hospital.”

CMS agrees with commenters in the Final Rule “that application of a scaling approach using bed count would be an effective way to ensure compliance, consistency and fairness in application of penalties across noncompliant hospitals” and finalized their proposal as follows:

• Hospitals with a bed count ≤ 30 will have a minimum Civil Monetary Penalty (CMP) of $300 per day or $109,500 for a full CY of noncompliance,
• Hospitals with at least thirty-one beds up to and including 550 beds will have a penalty of $10 per bed per day or a range from $113,150 to $2,007,500 penalty for a full CY of noncompliance depending on bed size, and
• Hospitals with greater than 550 beds will have a daily dollar penalty of $5,500 or $2,007,500 for a full CY of noncompliance.

Learn about changes to the Inpatient Only (IPO) by clicking here.

CY 2022 OPPS Final Rule CMS Press Release: https://www.cms.gov/newsroom/press-releases/cms-oppsasc-final-rule-increases-price-transparency-patient-safety-and-access-quality-care

The CMS released the Calendar Year (CY) 2022 Outpatient Prospective Payment System (OPPS) and Ambulatory Surgical Center (ASC) Payment System Final Rule on November 2, 2021. This article focuses on changes to the Inpatient Only (IPO) List and medical review of claims. Click here for an article reviewing changes to the ASC covered procedure list and hospital price transparency civil monetary penalties.

CMS reminds providers that “The removal of a service from the IPO list does not require the service to be performed only on an outpatient basis…we reiterate that services that are removed from the IPO list can be and are performed on individuals who are admitted as inpatients (as well as individuals who are registered hospital outpatients) when the patient’s condition warrants inpatient admission (65 FR 18456). It is a misinterpretation of CMS payment policy for providers to create policies or guidelines that establish the hospital outpatient setting as the baseline or default site of service for a procedure based on its removal from the IPO list. As stated in previous rulemaking, services that are no longer included on the IPO list are payable in either the inpatient or hospital outpatient setting subject to the general coverage rules requiring that any procedure be reasonable and necessary, and payment should be made pursuant to the otherwise applicable payment policies (84 FR 61354; 82 FR 59384; 81 FR 79697).”

Criteria used prior to CY 2021 to assess for removal of a procedure from the Inpatient Only (IPO) list:

• Most outpatient departments are equipped to provide the services to the Medicare population.
• The simplest procedure described by the code may be furnished in most outpatient departments.
• The procedure is related to codes that we have already removed from the IPO list.
• A determination is made that the procedure is being furnished in numerous hospitals on an outpatient basis.
• A determination is made that the procedure can be appropriately and safely furnished in an ASC and is on the list of approved ASC services or has been proposed by us for addition to the ASC list.

In CY 2021, CMS removed 298 musculoskeletal-related services from the IPO List and finalized the elimination of the list over three years. For CY 2022, CMS has done a one-eighty and finalized the following changes:

• The IPO list is not being eliminated,
• A reference of phasing out the IPO list through a 3-year transition has been removed,
• The five longstanding criteria for determining whether a service or procedure should be removed from the IPO list is being codified in regulation text, and
• Most of the procedures removed from the IPO list in CY 2021 are being added back to the list.

Commenters believed a few codes should not be added back to the IPO list and CMS agreed. CPT codes not being added back to the IPO list includes:

• CPT 22630: Arthrodesis, posterior interbody technique, including laminectomy and/or discectomy to prepare interspace (other than for decompression), single interspace; lumbar,
• CPT 23472: Arthroplasty, glenohumeral joint; total shoulder (glenoid and proximal humeral replacement (for example, total shoulder),
• CPT 27702: Arthroplasty, ankle; with implant (total ankle) and corresponding anesthesia codes:
• CPT 01638: Anesthesia for open or surgical arthroscopic procedures on humeral head and neck, sternoclavicular joint, acromioclavicular joint, and shoulder joint; total shoulder replacement, and
• CPT 01486: Anesthesia for open procedures on bones of lower leg, ankle, and foot; total ankle replacement

AccuCinch Device: New Inpatient Only Procedure

For the July 2021 update, the AMA’s CPT Editorial Panel established CPT code 0643T (Transcatheter left ventricular restoration device implantation including right and left heart catheterization and left ventriculography when performed, arterial approach) to describe the AccuCinch device implantation procedure.

CMS proposed to assign this code to status indicator (SI) “E1” (Items, codes, and services not covered by any Medicare outpatient benefit category; statutorily excluded; not reasonable and necessary) to indicate the service is not covered by Medicare.

A commenter requested the code be reassigned the inpatient-only SI “C,” believing “this is the more appropriate assignment for the ventricular restoration therapy based on the complex patient population enrolled in the US clinical trial. The commenter explained that the investigational device, the AccuCinch® Ventricular Restoration System, is currently under evaluation in the CORCINCH-HF pivotal trial (NCT04331769).”

CMS noting that “Based on the interventional structural heart (SH) technique involved in the procedure, use of an experimental device, and close monitoring of the patient that is required during the intra- and post-op period consistent with the resources available in the hospital inpatient setting, we believe the AccuCinch procedure should be designated as an inpatient-only procedure. We note that the CORCINCH-HF pivotal trial (NCT04331769) was approved by Medicare and meet’s CMS’ standards for coverage as an Investigation Device Exemption (IDE) study effective November 11, 2020.”

CMS finalized change the SI “E1” to “C” for CPT code 0643T.

Information about this procedure is available on the Ancora Heart, Inc. website at https://www.ancoraheart.com/ and information about the clinical trial at https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04331769.

Table 48 of the Final Rule lists changes made to the IPO list for CY 2022. Addendum E to this Final Rule includes all inpatient only procedure codes for CY 2022.

Medical Review of Certain Inpatient Hospital Admissions

For CY 2021, CMS finalized “that procedures removed from the IPO list after January 1, 2021, were indefinitely exempted from site-of-service claims denials under Medicare Part A, eligibility for BFCC-QIO referrals to RACs for noncompliance with the 2-Midnight rule, and RAC reviews for “patient status” (that is, site-of-service).” This exemption was to remain in place until Medicare claims data showed a procedure was performed more than 50 percent of the time in the outpatient setting.

For CY 2022, CMS finalized the proposal to “rescind the indefinite exemption and instead apply a 2-year exemption from two midnight medical review activities for services removed from the IPO list on or after January 1, 2021.”

As a provider, keep in mind this exemption is specific to site-of-service claim denials and does not include exemption from medical necessity reviews of services based on a National or Local Coverage Determinations (NCDs and LCDs) when applicable. Once a surgical procedure has been removed from the IPO List, documentation in the record must support the need for the inpatient admission.

Resources

CY 2022 OPPS Final Rule

• CMS Press Release: https://www.cms.gov/newsroom/press-releases/cms-oppsasc-final-rule-increases-price-transparency-patient-safety-and-access-quality-care
• CMS Fact Sheet: https://www.cms.gov/newsroom/fact-sheets/cy-2022-medicare-hospital-outpatient-prospective-payment-system-and-ambulatory-surgical-center-0

CMS Resumes Targeted Probe & Educate Program

In response to the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency (PHE), CMS suspended medical review activities on March 30, 2020. In August 2020, Recovery Auditors, Comprehensive Error Rate Testing Program, and Medicare Administrative Contractor post-payment reviews were resumed. At that time, the Targeted Probe and Educate (TPE) program remained on hold.

On May 8, 2019, CMS put a temporary hold on SSRs and HWDRG reviews as they planned to procure a new contractor to review both types of reviews on a national basis. The expectation was to award the contract by the 3rd quarter of calendar year 2019.

According to a CMS TPE Q&A document (link), when performing medical review as a part of this program, Medicare Administrative Contractors (MACs):

• Focus on specific providers/suppliers who, through data analysis, have been identified as varying significantly from their peers,
• Typically review 20-40 claims per provider/supplier, per item or service (round),
• Provide individualized education based on review results after a round, and
• Perform up to three rounds of reviews per item or service.

The CMS announced in the Thursday August 12, 2021, edition of MLN Connects (link) that the TPE Program is restarting “to help educate providers and reduce future denials and appeals.”

Livanta to Begin Short Stay Reviews and Higher Weighted DRG Reviews

Kepro and Livanta are the two Beneficiary and Family Centered Care Quality Improvement Organizations (BFCC-QIOs) that serve all regions across the nation. The BFCC-QIO scope of work, among other things includes performing certain types of medical record reviews. Two specific reviews are Short Stay Reviews (SSRs) and Higher Weight Diagnosis-Related Group (HWDRG) review.

It wasn’t until April of 2021, that Livanta announced they had been awarded this contract. On August 11, 2021, Livanta released a Provider Bulletin (link) to announce the official start of claims reviews. The bulletin includes information on the following topics:

• What Hospitals Can Expect,
• Hospital Inpatient Claim Review Types,
• HWDRG Review Process,
• SSR Process, and
• Questions and Education.

The review process for each type of medical review includes the timing of when they will begin requesting records. For HWDRG reviews, they expected to send the first medical record request the week of August 16th. For SSRs, Livanta anticipated sending the first individual medical record requests on or about the week of September 20, 2021. Note, record requests will be sent to your Medical Record point of contact via fax when possible or U.S. mail if fax is not possible. A hospital sample will consist of 30 claims reviewed within a rolling 3-month period and records must be submitted electronically.

I encourage you to visit Livanta’s webpage (link), read the Provider Bulletin and share this information with appropriate staff at your facility.