NOTE: All in-article links open in a new tab.

2014 IPPS Final Rule FAQ

Published on 

Tuesday, October 29, 2013

 | FAQ 

2-Midnight Benchmark and Psychiatric Services

Question:

Does the new 2-Midnight Benchmark apply to Inpatient Psychiatric Services?

Answer:

Yes, per the excerpt from the 2014 IPPS Final Rule below, the 2-Mignight Benchmark does apply to Inpatient Psychiatric Services.

“Comment: Commenters questioned the applicability of the proposed rule to differing types of hospital facilities. Commenters specifically requested clarity regarding application of the rule to IRFs and IPFs. Commenters further asserted that this distinction may conflict with State laws requiring inpatient admissions post 24 hours, and such States should be granted exception.

Response: In the proposed rule, our reference to section 1861(e) of the Act was intended to specify that CAHs were included in the proposed policies, not that we were proposing that IPFs or other non-IPPS hospitals should be excluded. Having considered the public comments to the proposed rule, we believe that all hospitals, LTCHs, and CAHs, with the exception of IRFs, would appropriately be included in our final policies regarding the 2-midnight admission guidance and medical review criteria for determining the general appropriateness of inpatient admission and Part A payment. Due to the inherent differences in the operation of and beneficiary admissions to IRFs, such providers must be excluded from the aforementioned admission guidelines and medical review instruction. We disagree with the commenters’ assertion that the 2-midnight admission and medical review policies conflict with existing state laws regarding observation. The 2-midnight benchmark does not prohibit physicians from ordering inpatient admission in accordance with state law; rather, this policy indicates when Medicare payment will be deemed appropriate. To the extent that State law requires admission in situations where Medicare payment would not be appropriate, providers should work with their States to resolve those discrepancies.”

Source: Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 160 / Monday, August 19, 2013 / Rules and Regulations 50949

Article Author:

This material was compiled to share information.  MMP, Inc. is not offering legal advice. Every reasonable effort has been taken to ensure the information is accurate and useful.