NOTE: All in-article links open in a new tab.

With 'With'?

Published on 

Tuesday, November 1, 2016

 | FAQ 

Q:

Given the new Coding Guidelines for FY 2017 that went into effect October 1, 2017, do we automatically assume a causal relation between two diagnoses associated with the term “with”?

 

A:

Yes. You may interpret “with” to mean “due to” or “associated with” when it appears in a code title, the Alphabetic Index, or an instructional note in the Tabular List. A relationship may be assumed even without a physician’s documentation linking the conditions together. In the Alphabetic Index, the term “with” is sequenced immediately following the main term instead of alphabetic order.

To name a few, this new rule will effect conditions such as hypertension, diabetes and congestive heart failure.

Examples:

  1. Code I11.0 would be assigned for hypertension with heart failure along with an additional code to identify the type of heart failure (I50._)
  2. Code E11.43 would be reported for type 2 diabetes with gastroparesis.
  3. Codes I13.2, I50.22, E11.22 and N18.6 would be the codes to report for a patient with hypertension, chronic systolic heart failure, type 2 diabetes and ESRD.

This guideline was actually effective in March 2016 but the Official Coding Guidelines were not updated until October 2016. You can refer to Section I.A.15 of the Official Coding Guidelines for FY 2017 and Coding Clinic 1st Qtr. 2016 page 11, 2nd Qtr. 2016 page 36 and 4th Qtr. 2016 page 141.

Article Author:

This material was compiled to share information.  MMP, Inc. is not offering legal advice. Every reasonable effort has been taken to ensure the information is accurate and useful.