Knowledge Base Article
FY 2015 IPPS Final Rule Focus On Quality
NOTE: All in-article links open in a new tab.
FY 2015 IPPS Final Rule Focus On Quality
Friday, August 8, 2014
On August 1st the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) released the FY 2015 Inpatient Prospective Payment System (IPPS) Final Rule. Over the next few weeks we will share with you key portions of the Rule.
As with the FY 2015 IPPS Proposed Rule, the Final Rule’s main focus is on Quality. Specifically, the following three Affordable Care Act (ACA) mandated Programs:
- Hospital Readmission Reduction Program,
- Hospital Value Based Purchasing (VBP) Program; and
- Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program.
All three Programs are designed to improve quality of care to the patient during and after a hospitalization. At the national level several of the measures within these Programs are closely aligned with the Institute for Health (IHI) Triple Aim. “In 2008 Don Berwick, Tom Nolan, and John Whittington first described the Triple Aim of simultaneously improving population health, improving the patient experience of care, and reducing per capita cost. The Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) developed the Triple Aim as a statement of purpose for fundamentally new health systems that contribute to the overall health of populations while reducing costs. The idea struck a nerve. It has since become the organizing framework for the US National Quality Strategy, for strategies of public and private health organizations around the world, and for many of the over 100 sites from around the world that have been involved in IHI’s Triple Aim prototyping initiative.”1
The Triple Aim of improving population health, improving the patient experience of care, and reducing per capita cost is not only the right thing for our patients it is a key framework to guide hospitals as our health care system moves forward towards pay for performance. Beyond the patient, it is also critical for hospitals to be aware of the potential payment reduction impact that these three Programs combined can have for hospitals with low quality performance.
Readmission Reduction Program:
Background
This Program began on October 1, 2012. In the first two years of the program hospitals with excessive 30 day readmission rates for Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI), Heart Failure (HF) and Pneumonia (PN) were penalized a percentage of their base operating DRG payment amount for ALL Medicare discharges.
What’s New?
- Eligible hospital discharges occurring between July 1, 2010 and June 30, 2013 were used to calculate the FY 2015 Excess Readmission Rates (ERRs).
- The maximum hospital payment adjustment is increasing to 3%, as required by the ACA.
- Two new readmission measures are being added to the program.
- 30-day Risk Standardized Readmission for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), and
- 30-day Risk Standardized Readmission following elective, primary total hip and/or total knee replacement (THA/TKA).
To ensure that hip fracture patients are excluded from this measure, CMS finalized a refinement to the measure cohort to exclude patients with hip fracture coded as either the principal or secondary diagnosis during the index admission. - The FY 2015 Hospital Readmission Reduction Program results are to be publically posted on Hospital Compare in December at http://www.medicare.gov/hospitalcompare/readmission-reduction-program.html.
- The rule finalized Readmissions for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) Surgical Procedure as an new measure in FY 2017.
- Though not new it is important to note that discharge diagnoses for each applicable condition are based on specific ICD-9-CM codes for that condition. These codes can be found on the QualityNet Web site at: http://www.QualityNet.org > Hospital-Inpatient > Claims-Based Measures > Readmission Measures > Measure Methodology.
Hospital Value-Based Purchasing Program:
Background
The Hospital VBP Program also began October 1, 2012. A CMS Fact Sheet indicates that this program works by rewarding hospitals “based on the quality of care provided to Medicare patients, how closely best clinical practices are followed, and how well hospitals enhance patients’ experiences of care during hospital stays. Hospitals are no longer paid solely based on the quantity of services they provide.”
As this program matures the weighting of measures is shifting away from clinical process of care measures towards the patient experience, patient outcomes and efficiency as evidenced in the following table:
What’s New?
- The percent reduction for redistribution is increasing to 1.5% of the base operating DRG payment amount for all participating hospitals.
- The total estimated amount available for value-based incentive payments in FY 2015 is approximately $1.4 billion.
- As finalized in the FY 2013 Final Rule, the Efficiency Domain is being added in FY 2015. The current measure in this domain is the Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) measure. This measure “assesses Medicare Part A and Part B payment for services provided to a Medicare beneficiary during a spending-per-beneficiary episode that spans from 3 days prior to an inpatient hospital admission through 30 days after discharge.”
The QualityNet MSPB web page indicates that “by measuring cost of care through this measure, CMS hopes to increase the transparency of care for consumers and recognize hospitals that are involved in the provision of high-quality care at lower cost to Medicare.” - Six measures are to be removed from the program in FY 2017 due to them being “Topped-Out.” Topped out measures meet the two criteria of having a statistically indistinguishable performance at the 75th to 90th percentile and having a truncated coefficient variation of ≤ 0.10. The Topped-Out measures include:
- Three new measures were finalized for FY 2017.
- Two new Outcome Measures for the Safety Domain
- Hospital-onset Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) bacteremia
- Clostridium difficile infection
- One new Clinical Process of Care Measure
- Elective Delivery Prior to 39 Weeks Gestation
- Two new measures were finalized for FY 2019.
- Hospital-Level Risk-Standardized Complication Rate (RSCR) Following Elective Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) and Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA)
- This measure will assess “complications occurring after THA and TKA surgery from the date of the index admission to 90 days post date of the index admission.”
- The outcome is one or more of the following complications:
- AMI, PN, or sepsis/septicemia within 7 days of admission;
- Surgical site bleeding, pulmonary embolism or death within 30 days of admission; or
- Mechanical complications, periprosthetic joint infection or wound infection within 90 days of admission.
- PSI-90 Composite Measure which includes PSI-3 – Pressure Ulcer Rate, PSI-6- Iatrogenic Pneumothorax Rate, PSI-7-Central Venous Catheter-Related Blood Stream Infections Rate and PSI-8-Post-op Hip Fracture Rate.
Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program:
Background
The Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 (DRA) required that the Secretary identify at least two HACs by October 1, 2007. HACs are high cost and/or high volume conditions that have been designated as a complication (CC or MCC) for coding purposes, have evidence-based guidelines to prevent the condition and if it was the only secondary diagnosis driving the MS-DRG assignment to a higher paying MS-DRG it would be discounted and the hospital would receive payment as if the HAC never occurred. HACs began to impact payment for hospitals for discharges occurring on or after October 1, 2008.
What’s New?
The HAC Reduction Program is set to begin on October 1, 2014. This program is a penalty program that will reduce payments to hospitals with excessive HACs by 1% for ALL Medicare discharges.
In the FY 2014 Final Rule CMS indicated that “the HAC Reduction Program aligns with our national strategy to improve health care quality by promoting the prevention of HACs, such as “never events” and HAIs. Our goal for the HAC Reduction Program is to heighten the awareness of HACs and reduce the number of incidences that occur.” They went on to state that “we believe that our efforts in using payment adjustments and our measurement authority will encourage hospitals to eliminate the incidence of HACs that could be reasonably prevented by applying evidenced based guidelines.”
In an August 5th MLN Connects™ Provider eNews CMS indicated that “this new program builds on the progress in this area achieved through the existing HAC program, which is currently saving approximately $30 million annually.”
The measures in this program are separated into two domains and scoring for each measure will begin at the minimum value for each measure. Scoring of the measures will result in a Total HAC Score. The finalized domains, domain weight and measures are as follows:
At the end of the day it really is all about the patient.
For more information:
- Additional details about all three of these programs can be found in the pre-published https://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2014/08/22/2014-18545/hospital-inpatient-prospective-payment-systems-for-acute-care-hospitals-and-the-long-term-care">Final Rule (pages 722-820, 822-976 and 976 – 1,049).
- The Final Rule has a scheduled publication date of 08/22/2014 and will be available online at: http://ofr.gov/(S(pcl2zalo5cz115uiw2as4qqr))/inspection.aspx.
Reference
1Stiefel M, Nolan K. A Guide to Measuring the Triple Aim: Population Health, Experience of Care, and Per Capita Cost. IHI Innovation Series white paper. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Institute for Healthcare Improvement; 2012. (Available on www.IHI.org)
This material was compiled to share information. MMP, Inc. is not offering legal advice. Every reasonable effort has been taken to ensure the information is accurate and useful.
Yes! Help me improve my Medicare FFS business.
Please, no soliciting.